Some people think that the most important thing about about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people. Do you agree or disagree? v.1
Some people think that the most important thing about about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people. v. 1
Affluent individuals have a responsibility to help the destitute by donating money, which is an essential part of a wealthy person. It is justifiable to say that the poor people would get a helping hand from the rich. I, holistically, agree with the statement, because if the elites do not donate the impoverishment, who would come forward to aid them.
To begin with, it is very atrocious to see one part of the world with wealth, and the other part of the globe is starving for a morsel of food. It is the duty of each wealthy individual to feed the poor who do not have anyone to assist, but the elite class. This is because if people want to eradicate poverty from the world, all the wealthy nations should have to come forward to reduce the rate of poverty. For example, the United Nation and the Red Cross have built up with the wealthiest nations who aid the poorest countries and developing terrains such as Somalia, Nizeria, Congo, to name but a few. As a result, these countries are not only getting food and shelter, but also medicine, which could help them from preventing the fatal diseases like cancer and AIDS.
In contrast, if the elite people reckon that it is not their duty to serve the poor nations of the world and nature would heal the pain of the destitute, it is a wrong idea. The reason is that the most significant characteristic of affluents is that they spread humanity rather than the selfish attitude towards the common human begins. For instance, if the wealthiest nations had not assisted the poor individuals in World War 1 and 2, people would not have seen a huge healthy population. Therefore, the sense of humanity arises from bestowing foods, clothes, shelters, et Cetra so that there will be a balance between the rich and the poor, which may, consequently, make the worldd a better place to live.
In conclusion, it is an integral part of wealthy individuals to help the people with bread and butter. I, diametrically, second with this viewpoint, as only wealthy persons can serve the poor, but none.
Affluent
individuals
have a responsibility to
help
the destitute by donating money, which is an essential
part
of a
wealthy
person. It is justifiable to say that the
poor
people
would
get
a helping hand from the rich. I,
holistically
,
agree
with the statement,
because
if the elites do not donate the impoverishment, who would
come
forward to aid them.
To
begin
with, it is
very
atrocious to
see
one
part
of the
world
with wealth, and the other
part
of the globe is starving for a morsel of food. It is the duty of each
wealthy
individual
to feed the
poor
who do not have anyone to assist,
but
the elite
class
. This is
because
if
people
want to eradicate poverty from the
world
, all the
wealthy
nations
should
have to
come
forward to
reduce
the rate of poverty.
For example
, the United
Nation
and the Red Cross have built up with the wealthiest
nations
who aid the poorest countries and developing terrains such as Somalia,
Nizeria
, Congo, to name
but
a few.
As a result
, these countries are not
only
getting food and shelter,
but
also
medicine, which could
help
them from preventing the fatal diseases like cancer and AIDS.
In contrast
, if the elite
people
reckon that it is not their duty to serve the
poor
nations
of the
world
and nature would heal the pain of the destitute, it is a
wrong
idea
. The reason is that the most significant characteristic of
affluents
is that they spread humanity
rather
than the selfish attitude towards the common human
begins
.
For instance
, if the wealthiest
nations
had not assisted the
poor
individuals
in
World
War 1 and 2,
people
would not have
seen
a huge healthy population.
Therefore
, the sense of humanity arises from bestowing foods, clothes, shelters,
et
Cetra
so
that there will be a balance between the rich and the
poor
, which may,
consequently
,
make
the
worldd
a better place to
live
.
In conclusion
, it is an integral
part
of
wealthy
individuals
to
help
the
people
with bread and butter. I,
diametrically
, second with this viewpoint, as
only
wealthy
persons can serve the
poor
,
but
none.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes