An often debated topic is whether the government should guarantee food safety for its people. Although there are good reasons to support this, I believe that individuals should be responsible for their meals.
A healthy diet depends primarily on foods available in the market, and for this reason it would be necessary for the government to control food sources. Without governmental control, citizens would find it difficult to know which foods are safe for their meals. By imposing food laws, the government can limit the level of additives that food producers use, allowing consumers to eat healthily and reducing the risk of food poisoning.
On the other hand, when a person decides what to eat, they do so of their free will, and this should be respected. Some foods are known as unhealthy, but only when people consume them excessively or frequently. For example, the consequences of the intake of fast food are not worth mentioning if we do not eat it regularly. Any involvement of the government with the daily choices would merely restrict the options we have.
Furthermore, some people have an allergy to a particular type of foods although it is generally healthy to others. It is unjustified for the government to restrict the consumption of mushrooms just because a few people cannot eat them. From this view, I feel that each person should be responsible for what they eat rather than relying on any policy from the government on food choices.
In conclusion, it seems to me that people should bear the responsibility for a healthy diet despite undeniable advantages of governmental control over food choices.
An
often
debated topic is whether the
government
should guarantee
food
safety for its
people
. Although there are
good
reasons to support this, I believe that individuals should be responsible for their meals.
A healthy diet depends
primarily
on
foods
available in the market, and
for this reason
it would be necessary for the
government
to control
food
sources. Without governmental control, citizens would find it difficult to know which
foods
are safe for their meals. By imposing
food
laws, the
government
can limit the level of additives that
food
producers
use
, allowing consumers to
eat
healthily
and reducing the
risk
of
food
poisoning.
On the other hand
, when a person decides what to
eat
, they do
so
of their free will, and this should
be respected
.
Some
foods
are known
as unhealthy,
but
only
when
people
consume them
excessively
or
frequently
.
For example
, the consequences of the intake of
fast
food
are not worth mentioning if we do not
eat
it
regularly
. Any involvement of the
government
with the daily choices would
merely
restrict the options we have.
Furthermore
,
some
people
have an allergy to a particular type of
foods
although it is
generally
healthy to others. It
is unjustified
for the
government
to restrict the consumption of mushrooms
just
because
a few
people
cannot
eat
them. From this view, I feel that each person should be responsible for what they
eat
rather
than relying on any policy from the
government
on
food
choices.
In conclusion
, it seems to me that
people
should bear the responsibility for a healthy diet despite undeniable advantages of governmental control over
food
choices.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
28Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes