A healthy citizen is a boon to the economic development of the country. Only the efforts of the healthy civilian can push the economic engine of the country to work at its highest efficiency. Some experts say that the government should make and enforce rules for physical well-being of their taxpayer. However, I believe that, people are more accountable for their own health than the regime.
Firstly, the type of diet is the personal issue of the individual. Any interference in the personal life of the people can attract resistance from the public. For instance, enforcing a complete vegetarian meal can raise the issue among the advocates of meat-based products. This can be harmful for the harmony of the society.
Secondly, working schedule of each person is different from the other. Some people are doing nine to five office jobs, while others are doing hard laborious work. Therefore, the nutritional needs of each person will vary based on the work they are doing. Consequently, making a general meal plan will make half population obese, while other struggling for proper nutrition.
However, the state should lay some guidelines for a healthy diet. These guidelines should be based on the scientific studies for the nutritional requirements of a human body. Moreover, authority should invest in awareness programs to aware masses about calorific value of different kinds of food. For instance, in some country’s laws have been enforced by the ministry to mention the number of calories in the product while selling it.
To sum it up, drafting a generalized diet plan by the state for their national will only be encountered by friction from the society. But an aware resident with proper guidance from rule can help in achieving the goal of a healthy society.
A
healthy
citizen is a boon to the economic development of the country.
Only
the efforts of the
healthy
civilian can push the economic engine of the country to work at its highest efficiency.
Some
experts say that the
government
should
make
and enforce
rules
for physical well-being of their taxpayer.
However
, I believe that,
people
are more accountable for their
own
health than the regime.
Firstly
, the type of diet is the personal issue of the individual. Any interference in the personal life of the
people
can attract resistance from the public.
For instance
, enforcing a complete vegetarian meal can raise the issue among the advocates of meat-based products. This can be harmful for the harmony of the society.
Secondly
, working schedule of each person is
different
from the other.
Some
people
are doing nine to five office jobs, while others are doing
hard
laborious work.
Therefore
, the nutritional needs of each person will vary based on the work they are doing.
Consequently
, making a general meal plan will
make
half population obese, while other struggling for proper nutrition.
However
, the state should lay
some
guidelines for a
healthy
diet. These guidelines should
be based
on the scientific studies for the nutritional requirements of a human body.
Moreover
, authority should invest in awareness programs to aware masses about calorific value of
different
kinds of food.
For instance
, in
some
country’s laws have
been enforced
by the ministry to mention the number of calories in the product while selling it.
To sum it up, drafting a generalized diet plan by the state for their national will
only
be encountered
by friction from the society.
But
an aware resident with proper guidance from
rule
can
help
in achieving the goal of a
healthy
society.