Today, In educational institute supervisor plays a vital role in evolution of students. It is believed that the teacher is the part and parcel to develop youngster behaviour along with parents. Nonetheless, some people believe that dogmatic principles of teaching curriculum would be benfiticial as scholar inculcates from its surroundings. This essay will elaborate on both the perspectives and presents my positions.
On one side of the argument, there are grounds to believe that a pupil can develop interpersonal and intellectual skills of the teachers. The lecturer can teach various skills through various events and competition. If a pupil participates in such activities, one can develop the skills of identifying and judging which are right or wrong. In addition to this, the scholar becomes more creative which is eventually advantageous to survive in today’s competitive world. For example, personal advancement courses are included in curriculum of various educational institutes to turn a pupil into a professional.
On the other hand, the argument that teachers should teach only academic subjects has several convincing points. As teacher are bound to complete syllabus within the provided time frame, they do not have sufficient time to organise various skill progress programmes. Since teachers have profound knowledge in academic subjects, it is advisable to provide in-depth guidance to students rather than extracurricular activities. Moreover, a tutor can also conduct various experiments and hands-on session to create the interest of students in such subjects.
To conclude, there is justification on both sides of the issue. From my point of view, behaviour and personality improvement program should go hand in hand as it nurtures pupil personality.
Today
, In educational institute supervisor plays a vital role in evolution of students. It
is believed
that the
teacher
is the part and parcel to develop youngster
behaviour
along with parents. Nonetheless,
some
people
believe that dogmatic principles of teaching curriculum would be
benfiticial
as scholar inculcates from its surroundings. This essay will elaborate on both the perspectives and presents my positions.
On one side of the argument, there are grounds to believe that a
pupil
can develop interpersonal and intellectual
skills
of the
teachers
. The lecturer can teach
various
skills
through
various
events
and competition. If a
pupil
participates in such activities, one can develop the
skills
of identifying and judging which are right or
wrong
.
In addition
to this, the scholar becomes more creative which is
eventually
advantageous to survive in
today
’s competitive world.
For example
, personal advancement courses
are included
in curriculum of
various
educational institutes to turn a
pupil
into a professional.
On the other hand
, the argument that
teachers
should teach
only
academic subjects has several convincing points. As
teacher
are bound
to complete syllabus within the provided time frame, they do not have sufficient time to
organise
various
skill
progress
programmes
. Since
teachers
have profound knowledge in academic subjects, it is advisable to provide in-depth guidance to students
rather
than extracurricular activities.
Moreover
, a tutor can
also
conduct
various
experiments and hands-on session to create the interest of students in such subjects.
To conclude
, there is justification on both sides of the issue. From my point of view,
behaviour
and personality improvement program should go hand in hand as it nurtures
pupil
personality.