Teachers should be accountable for educating to learners decided what is good and bad, so that they can act well it is claimed by few individuals; however, counter arguers believed that educators should only educate students educational topics. There are dual viewpoints to be discussed regarding the issue. Prior to my stance both the opinion is analysed further.
Examining the former prospect, the primary arguments the supporters would put forward is that pupils always obey their teachers more than others and spend most of their generation in school. This is because students can behave well if they most of their moment spend with teachers and schools. In addition to these learners also should know how to have good attitudes to other people. To explain this teacher can teach to pupils they how to communicate with other people and also
learn behaving well. To cap it all teachers can clear set of rules about behaviour.
On the contrary, the latter picture has its respective consideration. The foremost one is that teachers have limited turn periods for specific syllabus. By this I mean that educators do not educate their learners other activities or community knowledge can cause of highly syllabus. Apart from this teacher ought to teach only school subject due to lack of point and high competition. To justify all the school have competition nowadays to students acquire a better knowledge and second period is less, so teachers should not educate other knowledge. Last but not the list students are hoping to understand about the lessons and apply it in their daily life.
To conclude and give my opinion, I support to the former scene. Teachers should be a responsible student to consider right and wrong. Another claimed that only teach academic subjects. As pupils also should know how to have a good attitude; however, teachers have limited second period for specific syllabus.
Teachers
should be accountable for educating to learners decided what is
good
and
bad
,
so
that they can act well it
is claimed
by few individuals;
however
, counter arguers believed that educators should
only
educate
students
educational topics. There are dual viewpoints to
be discussed
regarding the issue. Prior to my stance both the opinion is
analysed
further
.
Examining the former prospect, the primary arguments the supporters would put forward is that pupils always obey their
teachers
more than others and spend most of their generation in
school
. This is
because
students
can behave well if they most of their moment spend with
teachers
and
schools
.
In addition
to these learners
also
should know how to have
good
attitudes to
other
people
. To
explain
this
teacher
can teach to pupils they how to communicate with
other
people
and
also
learn
behaving well. To cap it all
teachers
can
clear
set of
rules
about
behaviour
.
On the contrary
, the latter picture has its respective consideration. The foremost one is that
teachers
have limited turn periods for specific syllabus. By this I mean that educators do not educate their learners
other
activities or community knowledge can cause of
highly
syllabus. Apart from this
teacher
ought to teach
only
school
subject due to lack of point and high competition. To justify all the
school
have competition nowadays to
students
acquire a better knowledge and second period is less,
so
teachers
should not educate
other
knowledge. Last
but
not the list
students
are hoping to understand about the lessons and apply it in their daily life.
To conclude
and give my opinion, I support to the former scene.
Teachers
should be a responsible
student
to consider right and
wrong
. Another claimed that
only
teach academic subjects. As pupils
also
should know how to have a
good
attitude;
however
,
teachers
have limited second period for specific syllabus.