Nowadays, in this competitive world for success, knowledge and experience are very necessary. Therefore the students who get enrolled in a university directly from high school are less valuable and less contributive to the community as compared to those who take breaks during the study and take some experience through jobs and travelling. For these two different opinions, I am going to classify these two groups with names: group A and group B. Group A for those who do not take rest in studies up to university and group B for those who take a gap between school and university studies and get some practical experience in their lives.
As we know that study from high school to university studies will give us valuable theoretical experience only. Even in last year of the graduations university will send students to some of the companies for internships and apprenticeships to get training. But this is not enough for a practical job. A real job is something different and difficult from the training. When Group A students get jobs in a large company, they will face problems and they will not know how to handle the situations and how to deal customers and office staffs. Even some of their senior staffs will crush them hard and will tease them because fresh candidates do not know the work environment.
As compared to group A, group B students will be efficient and active and they will easily come across the problems and customers dealings. They will observe their senior staffs; what they are doing with them and they will response more professionally by using their experience and ability. The students from group B will be able to handle the corporate culture more appropriately only because they have better job understanding than the students of group A.
Group A students are less contributive also when a firm hires newcomers for a job. First, they have to train the newly hired staffs so more expenses are needed for that which comes from their salaries. And when they get experience, they are offer for better salaries. On other hand group B students from the beginning start earning more through their experience and work. This proves that group B is far more contributive to the new world economy.
So from the above discussion, it is concluded that Group A students are less efficient, less valuable and less contributive as compared to group B students. Hence in this modern era, we have to get a better education as well as better experience to become competent candidate everywhere. From this regards, taking a gap between the high school and university education to gain practical experience and understanding of the world is a better option.
Nowadays, in this competitive world for success, knowledge and
experience
are
very
necessary.
Therefore
the
students
who
get
enrolled in a
university
directly
from high
school
are
less
valuable and
less
contributive
to the community as compared to those
who
take breaks during the
study
and take
some
experience
through
jobs
and travelling. For these two
different
opinions, I am going to classify these two
groups
with names:
group
A and
group
B.
Group
A for those
who
do not take rest in
studies
up to
university
and
group
B for those
who
take a gap between
school
and
university
studies
and
get
some
practical
experience
in their
lives
.
As
we know that
study
from high
school
to
university
studies
will give us valuable theoretical
experience
only
. Even in last year of the
graduations
university
will
send
students
to
some of the
companies
for internships and apprenticeships to
get
training.
But
this is not
enough
for a practical
job
. A real
job
is something
different
and difficult from the training. When
Group
A
students
get
jobs
in a large
company
, they will face
problems and
they will not know how to handle the situations and how to deal customers and office
staffs
. Even
some
of their senior
staffs
will crush them
hard
and will tease them
because
fresh candidates do not know the work environment.
As compared to
group
A,
group
B
students
will be efficient and
active and
they will
easily
come
across the problems and customers dealings. They will observe their senior
staffs
; what they are doing with
them and
they will
response
more
professionally
by using their
experience
and ability. The
students
from
group
B will be able to handle the corporate culture more
appropriately
only
because
they have
better
job
understanding than the
students
of
group
A.
Group A
students
are
less
contributive
also
when a firm hires newcomers for a
job
.
First
, they
have to
train the
newly
hired
staffs
so
more expenses
are needed
for that which
comes
from their salaries. And when they
get
experience
, they are
offer
for
better
salaries. On other hand
group
B
students
from the beginning
start
earning more through their
experience
and work. This proves that
group
B is far more
contributive
to the new world economy.
So
from the above discussion, it
is concluded
that
Group
A
students
are
less
efficient,
less
valuable and
less
contributive
as compared to
group
B
students
.
Hence
in this modern era, we
have to
get
a
better
education
as well
as
better
experience
to become competent candidate everywhere. From
this
regards, taking a gap between the high
school
and
university
education to gain practical
experience
and understanding of the world is a
better
option.