In the contemporary epoch, some of individuals are of the belief that due to the technological growth and the internet accessibility, public libraries are not required for society. Should be replaced by other facilities. I strongly disagree with this notion that and, I will confer my reasons.
A significant chunk of communities welcomes this conception that Public libraries not only Play a tremendous part in culture and society development, but also they have a comfortable climate for readers. Public libraries, most of the time have and quiet atmosphere where readers can focus and concentrate more in the place without any noises and distractions. A rewarding illustration for that is University students who always prefer writing their dissertations and finish their business assignments on the libraries. Due to the fact that just libraries can reply to those demands.
Looking from another perspective, multifarious reasons can discuses to justify this state that traditional libraries should continue to exist. There is also a significant group of individuals believe that there are a lot of ancient books and references that contain historical values and they should be properly maintained in libraries because, they are historic heritage and unique. Furthermore, there are many self-appointed experts and professors upload different type of articles or resources in considerable fields, yet they have not been proven to be accurate or edited which caused import new false grammatic structure or defective enlightenment on the internet. But, resources in libraries are trustworthy and factual.
In conclusion, however, the internet changed and influenced different aspects of our life as well as reading and provided more opportunities to get access to information for humans, I tend to believe that public libraries are fundamental and the government should keep them for people.
In the contemporary epoch,
some of individuals
are of the belief that due to the technological growth and the internet accessibility,
public
libraries are not required for society. Should
be replaced
by other facilities. I
strongly
disagree with this notion that and, I will confer my reasons.
A significant chunk of communities welcomes this conception that
Public
libraries not
only
Play a tremendous part in culture and society development,
but
also
they have a comfortable climate for readers.
Public
libraries, most of the time have and quiet atmosphere where readers can focus and concentrate more in the place without any noises and distractions. A rewarding illustration for
that is
University students who always prefer writing their dissertations and finish their business assignments on the libraries. Due to the fact that
just
libraries can reply to those demands.
Looking from another perspective, multifarious reasons can discuses to justify this state that traditional libraries should continue to exist. There is
also
a significant group of individuals
believe
that there are
a lot of
ancient books and references that contain historical
values and
they should be
properly
maintained in libraries
because
, they
are historic
heritage and unique.
Furthermore
, there are
many
self-appointed experts and professors upload
different
type of articles or resources in considerable fields,
yet
they have not
been proven
to be accurate or edited which caused import new false
grammatic
structure or defective enlightenment on the internet.
But
, resources in libraries are trustworthy and factual.
In conclusion
,
however
, the internet
changed
and influenced
different
aspects of our life
as well
as reading and provided more opportunities to
get
access to information for humans, I tend to believe that
public
libraries are fundamental and the
government
should
keep
them for
people
.