Some people argue that female leadership should be over male authority. It cannot be denied that during past there were fewer wars and less violence when women were in power. However, I disagree with this attitude because, wars happen due to human greed, not the gender of who leads.
Principally, the major reason for disagreement with the statement is that female leadership does not mean to have a more peaceful society. Wars are not initiated by gender, rather they are a result of human greed. It is human nature to want more and more therefore, when that greed is not satisfied, conflicts happen. Moreover there were some examples in history that women as a leader caused wars such as, administration in Greece and Egypt that they showed no mercy to their enemies despite of being women.
On the other hand, in today's society, people often claim that if female rules a country, it might not have any war due to less violence. Although, it would be more peaceful or more friendly, it does not necessarily mean not to have war. Additionally, history is full of examples and it will repeat. The only reason why past had fewer wars under female management is because, in older times, most people hesitated to follow a woman, as a result there were fewer wars when women were in power.
In conclusion, conflicts and battles happen due to human's greediness not because of gender, also if we study through history, it can be seen that female leaders behave same as male governments and hence, reversing leadership from men to women do not mean the world to become a more powerful place.
Some
people
argue that
female
leadership should be over male authority. It cannot
be denied
that during past there were fewer
wars
and less violence when
women
were in power.
However
, I disagree with this attitude
because
,
wars
happen due to human greed, not the gender of who leads.
Principally
, the major reason for disagreement with the statement is that
female
leadership does not mean to have a more peaceful society.
Wars
are not initiated by gender,
rather
they are a result of human greed. It is human nature to want more and more
therefore
, when that greed is not satisfied, conflicts happen.
Moreover
there were
some
examples in history that
women
as a leader caused
wars
such as, administration in Greece and Egypt that they
showed
no mercy to their enemies
despite of
being women.
On the other hand
, in
today
's society,
people
often
claim that if
female
rules
a country, it might not have any
war
due to less violence. Although, it would be more peaceful or more friendly, it does not
necessarily
mean not to have
war
.
Additionally
, history is full of examples and it will repeat. The
only
reason why past had fewer
wars
under
female
management is
because
, in older times, most
people
hesitated to follow a woman,
as a result
there were fewer
wars
when
women
were in power.
In conclusion
, conflicts and battles happen due to human's greediness not
because
of gender,
also
if we study through history, it can be
seen
that
female
leaders behave same as male
governments
and
hence
, reversing leadership from
men
to
women
do not mean the world to become a more powerful place.