Nowadays, sports holds a fascination on an individual life because of the national honour they gain on participation in the World Cup or Olympics. For an individual, training is expensive, so they depend upon external funding assistance to achieve the desired result. Some people are of the opinion that the country should support financially to national players, while others advocate that private institutions should financially help the sports players. It is essential to admit that both views have their benefits. In this essay, I will discuss both possible reasons that support each aspect, and what advantages they bring to society.
On the one hand, many think that the government should give private training to the players. In other words, the fund them so the athletes could be ready for world competitions. Since they are representing the country, the government must support financially and motivate them. For example, in developed countries, the government couch the player by the professional trainers, also arrange the essential equipment and sports area so the participants could practice.
On the other hand, those in favour that NGOs funding is that it would reduce the burden on the government. Moreover, the businesses are profit driven so they would provide the best coaching and facilities to their team. The reason they would support the team is that they want to make use of their market influence to promote their products or service. So, they also get something back by doing so.
So in my opinion, the government could fund equally to all the sports and encourage the young adult to showcase their talent in the world competition, and the players own responsibility towards the nation. But by private sector funding, these players are more interested in earning money, and companies do not give equal opportunities to all the sports.
To conclude, national teams and players are standing for the nation should be financially supported by the government.
Nowadays,
sports
holds a fascination on an individual life
because
of the national
honour
they gain on participation in the World Cup or Olympics. For an individual, training is expensive,
so
they depend upon external funding assistance to achieve the desired result.
Some
people
are of the opinion that the country should
support
financially
to national
players
, while others advocate that private institutions should
financially
help
the
sports
players
. It is essential to admit that both views have their benefits. In this essay, I will discuss both possible reasons that
support
each aspect, and what advantages they bring to society.
On the one hand,
many
think
that the
government
should give private training to the
players
.
In other words
, the fund them
so
the athletes could be ready for world competitions. Since they are representing the country, the
government
must
support
financially
and motivate them.
For example
, in
developed countries
, the
government
couch the
player
by the professional trainers,
also
arrange the essential equipment and
sports
area
so
the participants could practice.
On the other hand
, those in
favour
that NGOs funding is that it would
reduce
the burden on the
government
.
Moreover
, the businesses are profit driven
so
they would provide the best coaching and facilities to their team. The reason they would
support
the team is that they want to
make
use
of their market influence to promote their products or service.
So
, they
also
get
something back by doing
so
.
So
in my opinion, the
government
could fund
equally
to all the
sports
and encourage the young adult to showcase their talent in the world competition, and the
players
own
responsibility towards the nation.
But
by private sector funding, these
players
are more interested in earning money, and
companies
do not give equal opportunities to all the sports.
To conclude
, national teams and
players
are standing for the nation should be
financially
supported by the
government
.