Some people believe that national sport teams and individual men and women who represent their country should be financially supported by the government Others think they should be funded by non government ways such as business scholarship What is yo v.2

In recent times there has been a phonomenon of the heated debate on the issue of who should provise the athletes with financial aid. Whereas some people are inclined to the view that the government should take charge of it, others are opposed to this viewpoint insisting on the fund of of non-governmental organizations. However, I hold a strong conviction that both of them are equally paramount for the satisfactory progress of sportsmen. On the one hand, national sportsteams are often perceived as the pride of a country which means indegeous people feel contended and burst with pride when those athletes make headway. Contrastly, involvment of privately-run companies might result in commercialising them damaging the image of the nation. Futhermore, the victory of them irrefutably unites residents leading on valuable contribution to close-knit community. Hence, who should take care of them is the authorities. On the other hand, monetary values backed by private sectors is of the essence in this statement due to the government' s plethora of allocations to other fields such as education system and health care services. That is to say, presence of them would alleviate the political figures' burden supplying sports centres with better equipment, top-class facilities, nutrition as well as training methods. Obviously, the perfomance of sports teams is believed to be boosted with the help of them. To recapitulate, the mere support of state-run organizations is not sufficient in essence. The aid of privately owned businesses who are eligible to put up finance, can fulfil sportspeople' s potential.