While some individuals believe that travelling to foreign nations in order to enhance knowledge is essential, others consider that it is not significant due to the vast availability of the media resources which provide ample information regarding their customs and traditions. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth. I, however, think that it is appropriate to travel abroad despite the involvement of huge amount of money.
To commence with, a vast majority of people would argue that an individual must go to the other countries. This is probably because they will interact with the local people personally, which in turn, ultimately results in the exchange of their culture and beliefs, and moreover, mutual interaction will help them in the establishment of a healthy relationship with the citizens of those nations. In the modern era, for instance, an enormous number of people are travelling to abroad as a tourist, such as educational, religious, business, and many more, which is contributing in the exchange of their cultural norms. In short, the advocates of this perspective are right in thinking so.
In contrast, the opponents claim that there is no need to travel to distinct places because lots of digital sources are providing plenty of knowledge about the different parts of the world. Since these days, there are numerous satellite channels, which are capable enough to entertain individuals, and one can enjoy within the vicinity of their comfort zone, and furthermore, it would save a lot of capital that is generally spent on the booking of air tickets, and for staying in hotels, and other expenses. In the 21st century, for example, we are equipped with the internet facilities and we can Google anything for the expansion of horizons. Thus, it would not be wrong to say that modern devices have reduced the need to travel.
In conclusion, although the society is divided on the view of travelling to other nations, there are some who regard it as a necessity, whereas another section of the community opposes the same due to easy accessibility of various resources. I personally think that these equipments cannot replace the fun involved in the itinerary of the foreign countries.
While
some
individuals believe that travelling to foreign nations in order to enhance knowledge is essential, others consider that it is not significant due to the vast availability of the media resources which provide ample information regarding their customs and traditions. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth. I,
however
,
think
that it is appropriate to travel abroad despite the involvement of huge amount of money.
To commence with, a vast majority of
people
would argue that an individual
must
go to the
other
countries. This is
probably
because
they will interact with the local
people
personally
, which in turn,
ultimately
results in the exchange of their culture and beliefs, and
moreover
, mutual interaction will
help
them in the establishment of a healthy relationship with the citizens of those nations. In the modern era,
for instance
, an enormous number of
people
are travelling to abroad as a tourist, such as educational, religious, business, and
many
more, which is contributing in the exchange of their cultural norms. In short, the advocates of this perspective are right in thinking
so
.
In
contrast, the opponents claim that there is no need to travel to distinct places
because
lots of digital sources are providing
plenty
of knowledge about the
different
parts of the world. Since these days, there are numerous satellite channels, which are capable
enough
to entertain individuals, and one can enjoy within the vicinity of their comfort zone, and
furthermore
, it would save
a lot of
capital
that is
generally
spent on the booking of air tickets, and for staying in hotels, and
other
expenses. In the 21st century,
for example
, we
are equipped
with the internet
facilities and
we can Google anything for the expansion of horizons.
Thus
, it would not be
wrong
to say that modern devices have
reduced
the need to travel.
In conclusion
, although the society
is divided
on the view of travelling to
other
nations, there are
some
who regard it as a necessity, whereas another section of the community opposes the same due to easy accessibility of various resources. I
personally
think
that these equipments cannot replace the fun involved in the itinerary of the foreign countries.