People have different opinions as to whether nations should spend the national budget on hosting international sporting events. Personally, I believe that the events have beneficial impacts on the host nations as a whole.
Advocates of the former view might assert that spending on sporting events could hurt countries’ economies. Staging the international sporting events would incur enormous expenses, to the detriment of the host nations’ budgets. The expenditure on renovating their stadiums, implementing higher levels of security, and hiring performance artists is so significant that hardly can poverty-stricken nations afford it. For example, instead of spending billions of dollars on hosting the 2010 World Cup and then drowning in debt, South Africa should have been expended those budgets on addressing the physiological needs of their citizens, such as improving the standard of living and eliminating starvation.
However, I support the view that nations might reap a multiplicity of benefits from staging those sporting events. Firstly, A wide range of employment opportunities are available during years of planning and investment, and this will contribute to a decrease in unemployment. Secondly, enthusiasm and excitement are an indispensable part of these events; it is clear from this emotional boost that people of the host nations will experience a drastic improvement in their life satisfaction. Lastly, such events are conducive to the development of culture and tourism in the host nations. Social cohesion and cultural understanding are further developed, thanks to stadiums and arenas thronged with flows of people from all over the world.
In conclusion, I concur with the portion of people who believe that the benefits of hosting international events would outweigh the drawbacks, although it might dig immensely into countries’ economies.
People
have
different
opinions
as to whether
nations
should spend the national budget on hosting international sporting
events
.
Personally
, I believe that the
events
have beneficial impacts on the
host
nations
as a whole.
Advocates of the former view might assert that spending on sporting
events
could hurt countries’ economies. Staging the international sporting
events
would incur enormous expenses, to the detriment of the
host
nations’
budgets. The expenditure on renovating their stadiums, implementing higher levels of security, and hiring performance artists is
so
significant that hardly can poverty-stricken
nations
afford it.
For example
,
instead
of spending billions of dollars on hosting the 2010 World Cup and then drowning in debt, South Africa should have
been expended
those budgets on addressing the physiological needs of their citizens, such as improving the standard of living and eliminating starvation.
However
, I support the view that
nations
might reap a multiplicity of benefits from staging those sporting
events
.
Firstly
, A wide range of employment opportunities are available during years of planning and investment, and this will contribute to a decrease in unemployment.
Secondly
, enthusiasm and excitement are an indispensable part of these
events
; it is
clear
from this emotional boost that
people
of the
host
nations
will experience a drastic improvement in their life satisfaction.
Lastly
, such
events
are conducive to the development of culture and tourism in the
host
nations
. Social cohesion and cultural understanding are
further
developed, thanks to stadiums and arenas thronged with flows of
people
from all over the world.
In conclusion
, I concur with the portion of
people
who believe that the benefits of hosting international
events
would outweigh the drawbacks, although it might dig
immensely
into countries’ economies.