Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.20

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. v. 20
The world is producing more waste than ever before and hence it is becoming increasingly important to recycle and reuse all products. Some citizens believe that the only way people will start recycling the residue is if governments pass ruling and make it mandatory. This essay will argue that despite being a simple task, the action of decomposing discarded materials is not performed by many and therefore it must be enforced by law. Many people think that recycling it not required or citizens should be allowed to choose whether or not they want to engage in this activity. They believe it is the duty of the local municipal commissions to reclaim and reprocess the garbage. Furthermore, they are against imposing it on people because it will increase the work for already stressed judicial system. For instance, in the United kingdom, counties have started to make roads out of chemically treated plastic refuse. So clearly, there is no need for any legalities around recycling. Conversely, if countries make it a mandate to recycle waste materials, then it will force their citizens to obey the rules. Moreover, the fear of being fined or punished will make sure that they decompose and reuse all possible scrap. According to a recent study by Harvard University, nations in which not segregating the trash is a punishable act, an astonishing fifty percent more citizens practice the simple act of separating the garbage into different bins. These reasons have bolstered the idea to legalise recycling. To conclude, this essay argued that people who are against the concept of making recycling a legal requirement, have a flawed understanding of it and severely underestimate its benefits. In my opinion, it is absolute imperative that governments make it mandatory for every citizen to recycle their waste and levy heavy fines to ensure that no one breaks this law.
The world is producing more waste than ever
before
and
hence
it is becoming
increasingly
important
to recycle and reuse all products.
Some
citizens
believe that the
only
way
people
will
start
recycling the residue is if
governments
pass ruling and
make
it mandatory. This essay will argue that despite being a simple task, the action of decomposing discarded materials is not performed by
many
and
therefore
it
must
be enforced
by law.

Many
people
think
that recycling it not required or
citizens
should be
allowed
to choose
whether or not
they want to engage in this activity. They believe it is the duty of the local municipal commissions to reclaim and reprocess the garbage.
Furthermore
, they are against imposing it on
people
because
it will increase the work for already
stressed
judicial system.
For instance
, in the
United kingdom
, counties have
started
to
make
roads out of
chemically
treated plastic refuse.
So
clearly
, there is no need for any legalities around recycling.

Conversely
, if countries
make
it a mandate to recycle waste materials, then it will force their
citizens
to obey the
rules
.
Moreover
, the fear of
being fined
or punished will
make
sure that they decompose and reuse all possible scrap. According to a recent study by Harvard University, nations in which not segregating the trash is a punishable act, an astonishing fifty percent more
citizens
practice the simple act of separating the garbage into
different
bins. These reasons have bolstered the
idea
to
legalise
recycling.

To conclude
, this essay argued that
people
who are against the concept of making recycling a legal requirement, have a flawed understanding of it and
severely
underestimate its benefits. In my opinion, it is absolute imperative that
governments
make
it mandatory for every
citizen
to recycle their waste and levy heavy fines to ensure that no one breaks this law.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes
To have another language is to possess a second soul.
Charlemagne

IELTS essay Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. v. 20

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
308 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts