Some people think that governments should invest more in public services instead of wasting money on arts such as music and paintings. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.4
Some people think that governments should invest more in public services instead of wasting money on arts such as music and paintings. v. 4
Over the years, the governments' budget has become tighter, thus every expense must be carefully calculated. While some believe that governments' expenses should be focused on essential services, I would argue that a balance between public services and arts should be taken into account when planning the annual budget.
Regarding public services, it is clear that a substantial amount of the annual spending plan should be reserved in order to improve their quality. Such aspects are responsible to raise population's well-being, which is crucial to develop the local community. For instance, when investment in public healthcare is prioritised, ordinary diseases, such as measles or chicken pox, can be completely exterminated, reducing, therefore, infant mortality. If authorities put these services on the back burner, many issues would lead to people's contentment reduction, hence generalised dissatisfaction.
However, investing in the arts is not a waste of money, since the basics are already provided. In fact, the arts and other leisure activities play a pivotal role to raise citizen's satisfaction. This is because the arts can lead to low stress levels, as well as promoting a slump at routinely anxieties. Not counting with the fact that a society without artistic development is an automatic society, with no creativity and no potential to grow much further. To illustrate, Italian Renascentism was a period when not only had arts an essential importance, but also economic development was in excel.
In conclusion, despite investing in basic services, such as healthcare, local councils should reserve an amount of the annual funds to finance artistic initiatives, since it is imperative to a thorough progress of the nation as a whole.
Over the years, the
governments
' budget has become tighter,
thus
every expense
must
be
carefully
calculated. While
some
believe that
governments
' expenses should
be focused
on essential
services
, I would argue that a balance between public
services
and
arts
should
be taken
into account when planning the annual budget.
Regarding public
services
, it is
clear
that a substantial amount of the annual spending plan should
be reserved
in order to
improve
their quality. Such aspects are responsible to raise population's well-being, which is crucial to develop the local community.
For instance
, when investment in public healthcare is
prioritised
, ordinary diseases, such as measles or chicken pox, can be completely exterminated, reducing,
therefore
, infant mortality. If authorities put these
services
on the back burner,
many
issues would lead to
people
's contentment reduction,
hence
generalised
dissatisfaction.
However
, investing in the
arts
is not a waste of money, since the basics are already provided. In fact, the
arts
and other leisure activities play a pivotal role to raise citizen's satisfaction. This is
because
the
arts
can lead to low
stress
levels,
as well
as promoting a slump at
routinely
anxieties. Not counting with the fact that a society without artistic development is an automatic society, with no creativity and no potential to grow much
further
. To illustrate, Italian
Renascentism
was a period when not
only
had
arts
an essential importance,
but
also
economic development was in excel.
In conclusion
, despite investing in basic
services
, such as healthcare, local councils should reserve an amount of the annual funds to finance artistic initiatives, since it is imperative to
a thorough progress
of the nation as a whole.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes