There is mixed opinion when it comes to deciding about sources of income for creative artists. This essay will narrate both the aspects
Artists can focus on their one art development, if money part of survival is taken care by the government of the country in which artists are living. Initially, artists are in the struggling situation because to generate art they must concentrate on their job of performing art, which might not generate income. In such situation if the authorities of nations take the responsibility of art producers. For example, initially the painters do not find buyers for their paintings, also there is cost involved in procuring the material to generate art, if this is taken care by the government, they can focus on awesome creativity, if it gets materialized it will be a life changing opportunity for artists. However, there are negativities exist, such as what if artists are not able to generate income, then government’s investment will not be useful, and it will be wastage.
There are private bodies such as non-government organizations (NGOs), who can take responsibility of taking care of artists for the delayed gratification purpose. Initially as artists are not famous and with almost zero income, such NGOs can get artists at very low rates, but as progress is made by artists, soon NGOs will able to generate income through the artists. On the contrary, such private bodies should not put pressure on artists to monetize the art. Otherwise artists can not focus on art development.
To sum up, both the views are genuine, government should financially support the artists so that their art should not get nullified because of money for living. Also, private organizations and artists can have mutual benefits.
There
is mixed
opinion when it
comes
to deciding about sources of
income
for creative
artists
. This essay will narrate both the aspects
Artists can focus on their one
art
development, if money part of survival
is taken
care by the
government
of the country in which
artists
are living.
Initially
,
artists
are in the struggling situation
because
to
generate
art
they
must
concentrate on their job of performing
art
, which might not
generate
income
. In such situation if the authorities of nations take the responsibility of
art
producers.
For example
,
initially
the painters do not find buyers for their paintings,
also
there
is cost
involved in procuring the material to
generate
art
, if this
is taken
care by the
government
, they can focus on awesome creativity, if it
gets
materialized it will be a life changing opportunity for
artists
.
However
, there are negativities exist, such as what if
artists
are not able to
generate
income
, then
government’s
investment will not be useful, and it will be wastage.
There are private bodies such as non-
government
organizations (NGOs), who can take responsibility of taking care of
artists
for the delayed gratification purpose.
Initially
as
artists
are not
famous
and with almost zero
income
, such NGOs can
get
artists
at
very
low rates,
but
as progress
is made
by
artists
,
soon
NGOs
will able
to
generate
income
through the
artists
.
On the contrary
, such private bodies should not put pressure on
artists
to monetize the
art
.
Otherwise
artists
can not focus on
art
development.
To sum up, both the views are genuine,
government
should
financially
support the
artists
so
that their
art
should not
get
nullified
because
of money for living.
Also
, private organizations and
artists
can have mutual benefits.