Many people suppose that the government should spend expenditure on talented artists, while others believe that they should be supported financially by substitutable funding. In my opinion, gifted ones should be funded by both authorities and other organizations.
Several individuals are persuaded that governments should allocate their resources to funding for artistic professionals. Since they make significant contributions to the improvement of culture which is a crucial aspect of the existing of a nation. The government can hold music competitions for musicians and singers, which could encourage them to devote their music aptitudes and then create a more abundant culture. In addition, it is totally justified if national funding is allocated to supporting painters and musicians due to the boom of artistic industries in recent years. It is likely that investing in these sectors properly could create an immense income for nations.
However, others think that excellent artists should be gotten financial support from commercial or non-government organizations. The first reason is that the government has to allocate scared resources to funding for other social problems such as health, education. It is starved of money that authorities invest a large amount of money in artists when the country is in poor conditions. Secondly, private funding for artistic activities is usually much larger compared to subsidies of the government. For example, an entertaining company can organize a live concert with large scale containing hundreds even thousands of audiences. It seems that these corporations are more able to advertise talented artists and bring their excellent works of arts to more public.
In conclusion, while many people argue that talented musicians and painters should be invested by the government, others think that it is better that investments in art come from other organizations. However, I am convinced that all of them should collaborate to support better artists.
Many
people
suppose that the
government
should spend expenditure on talented
artists
, while others believe that they should
be supported
financially
by substitutable
funding
. In my opinion, gifted ones should
be funded
by both authorities and
other
organizations.
Several individuals
are persuaded
that
governments
should allocate their resources to
funding
for artistic professionals.
Since
they
make
significant contributions to the improvement of culture which is a crucial aspect of the existing of a nation. The
government
can hold music competitions for musicians and singers, which could encourage them to devote their music aptitudes and then create a more abundant culture.
In addition
, it is
totally
justified if national
funding
is allocated
to supporting painters and musicians due to the boom of artistic industries in recent years. It is likely that investing in these sectors
properly
could create an immense income for nations.
However
, others
think
that excellent
artists
should
be gotten
financial support from commercial or non-
government
organizations. The
first
reason is that the
government
has to
allocate scared resources to
funding
for
other
social problems such as health, education. It
is starved
of money that authorities invest a large amount of money in
artists
when the country is in poor conditions.
Secondly
, private
funding
for artistic activities is
usually
much larger compared to subsidies of the
government
.
For example
, an entertaining
company
can organize a
live
concert with large scale containing hundreds even thousands of audiences. It seems that these corporations are more able to advertise talented
artists
and bring their excellent works of arts to more public.
In conclusion
, while
many
people
argue that talented musicians and painters should
be invested
by the
government
, others
think
that it is better that investments in art
come
from
other
organizations.
However
, I
am convinced
that all of them should collaborate to support better
artists
.