There are a rich variety of art styles all across the world and they represent the history of each nation in various ways. People have different views on the issue of devoting an amount of money to the artists by governments as opposed to private resources, I believe that artists should be supported financially by the governments.
There are some persuasive arguments in favor of the governments' financial support. It is believed that different types of arts are the national identity for nations and it is a way to introduce the culture and customs of the host country to other countries in the world. A salient example of this is London, that supports its artists financially and they earn a large amount of money by exporting their pieces of art to other parts of the globe as well as holding musical concerts which could boost the economy of the country up to 30% in 2008. Furthermore, artists have no particular resource for income and consequently they need the support of governments in order to access prosperity and become renowned among people. I believe that if artists have no anxiety and stress for making a living they would be more motivated to focus on their work and create fabulous pieces of art and it would bring fame and money for them in the future.
On the other hand, there are some strong arguments against this issue. Some people assert that government should spend money on more important schemes such as health, education and social welfare that enhance the quality of people' s life and it is not targeted only a specific group of residents, so the average quality of life will improve and poverty will be eradicated and a majority of residents of urban and rural areas will be pulled out of poverty. Moreover, there are affluent funding buddies who are interested in investing money on art and they are enthusiastic to support artists by running exhibitions or purchasing their pieces of arts.
In conclusion, not only governments but also the rich people should support the artists, it is futuristic and wise to help them since they make the future of nations and they can be a good source of income for governments in the future.
There are a rich variety of
art
styles all across the
world and
they represent the history of each nation in various ways.
People
have
different
views on the issue of devoting an amount of
money
to the
artists
by
governments
as opposed to private resources, I believe that
artists
should
be supported
financially
by the
governments
.
There are
some
persuasive arguments in favor of the
governments&
#039; financial
support
. It
is believed
that
different
types of
arts
are the national identity for nations and it is a way to introduce the culture and customs of the host country to other countries in the world. A salient example of this is London, that
supports
its
artists
financially and
they earn a large amount of
money
by exporting their pieces of
art
to other parts of the globe
as well
as holding musical concerts which could boost the economy of the country up to 30% in 2008.
Furthermore
,
artists
have no particular resource for income and
consequently
they need the
support
of
governments
in order to access prosperity and become renowned among
people
. I believe that if
artists
have no anxiety and
stress
for making a living they would be more motivated to focus on their work and create fabulous pieces of
art
and it would bring fame and
money
for them in the future.
On the other hand
, there are
some
strong arguments against this issue.
Some
people
assert that
government
should spend
money
on more
important
schemes such as health, education and social welfare that enhance the quality of
people&
#039; s life and it is not targeted
only
a specific group of residents,
so
the average quality of life will
improve
and poverty will
be eradicated
and a majority of residents of urban and rural areas will
be pulled
out of poverty.
Moreover
, there are affluent funding buddies who
are interested
in investing
money
on
art and
they are enthusiastic to
support
artists
by running exhibitions or purchasing their pieces of arts.
In conclusion
, not
only
governments
but
also
the rich
people
should
support
the
artists
, it is futuristic and wise to
help
them since they
make
the future of
nations and
they can be a
good
source of income for
governments
in the future.