Today, stepping out of the house without the car waiting at the doorstep has become unthinkable. The dependancy has increased exponentially now than when the cars first graced the British roads in 1888. By 2000 this number had been predicted to go up to 29 million. Yes the concerns about such a boom was realistic, and so skeptisism started fogging the ownership and usage of the cars by public. International laws to regulate this growth was also thought to be a solution.
Possession and usage of cars is a matter of personal freedom, laws restricting the same will play havoc not only on the will of the people but will also affect the production, employment, thus decreasing the GDP of many countries, entire sections of the society would be devastated. Not to mention the distress, emergency situation crisis. and potential outrage that may be the end result of imposing such laws.
No doubt, the increasing pollution and depletion of natural resources, like oil is a major concern to the world at the time, when global warming is the tragedy of the day. So yes, the people should be made aware of the harm that is occurring and the ways they can help to nullify or at least reduce the effect. Car pooling, encouraging other transport by discounting and easy availability will make the people consciously ditch the car occasionally and use other means. It will also give them a sense of accomplishment of trying to save the nature while having the security of their personal freedom of owning a car.
it would be a win win situation if we convince the people to not entirely rely on their personal cars at all times, and to occasionally use public transport or other means to commute.
Today
, stepping out of the
house
without the
car
waiting at the doorstep has become unthinkable. The
dependancy
has increased
exponentially
now
than when the
cars
first
graced the British roads in 1888. By 2000 this number had
been predicted
to go up to 29 million. Yes the concerns about such a boom was realistic, and
so
skeptisism
started
fogging the ownership and usage of the
cars
by public. International laws to regulate this growth was
also
thought
to be a solution.
Possession and usage of
cars
is a matter of personal freedom, laws restricting the same will play havoc not
only
on the will of the
people
but
will
also
affect the production, employment,
thus
decreasing the GDP of
many
countries, entire sections of the society would
be devastated
. Not to mention the distress, emergency situation crisis.
and
potential outrage that may be the
end
result of imposing such laws.
No doubt, the increasing pollution and depletion of natural resources, like oil is a major concern to the world at the time, when global warming is the tragedy of the day.
So
yes, the
people
should
be made
aware of the harm
that is
occurring and the ways they can
help
to nullify or at least
reduce
the effect.
Car
pooling, encouraging other transport by discounting and easy availability will
make
the
people
consciously
ditch the
car
occasionally
and
use
other means. It will
also
give them a sense of accomplishment of trying to save the nature while having the security of their personal freedom of owning a car.
it
would be a
win win
situation if we convince the
people
to not
entirely
rely on their personal
cars
at all times, and to
occasionally
use
public transport or other means to commute.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
11Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes