Different people having different opinions as few of them are opposing government fund for Art and culture, where some people believe the development of population and culture. There are both positive and negative impacts are observed in government funding for the Arts and cultures.
Firstly, the government funding for cultural development unable to accounted as they are immeasurable benefits. Although, there is some possibility of misuse of funds by the local leaders. Even the end user, who originally to be benefitted remains looser as the recognisance shall not be happen due to some political impedance. Moreover the essential commodities like transportation and other public services budget get down because the funds being diverted to the culture activities. Nowadays, almost in all the developing countries in the world reluctant to divert their funds towards art and culture improvement as it has not shown any economic growth to them.
Secondly, encouragement of the social arts is making the people on the same page. This results unity of people and skills development as well. Hence the developed countries, which having sufficient amounts to infrastructure developments can encourage. Despite of development of the country, government should take initiations to improve the internal arts of people. This definitely improves population analytical thinking and sharp catching skills. Finally, many countries in this regard taking initiation and getting beautiful results.
By concluding, The craft arts which are adopted from their culture to be funded undoubtedly. Since, the improvement of the arts gives fruitful results along with time. In my prospective, all the countries have to look in the direction of increasing the skill sets, which indirectly helps the economic growth of the country. Also, need to take appropriate actions to get utilised government funds properly for the allocated works.
Different
people
having
different
opinions as few of them are opposing
government
fund
for
Art
and
culture
, where
some
people
believe the
development
of population and
culture
. There are both
positive
and
negative
impacts
are observed
in
government
funding for the
Arts
and cultures.
Firstly
, the
government
funding for cultural
development
unable to accounted as they are immeasurable benefits.
Although
, there is
some
possibility of misuse of funds by the local leaders. Even the
end
user, who
originally
to be
benefitted
remains looser as the
recognisance
shall not be
happen
due to
some
political impedance.
Moreover
the essential commodities like transportation and other public services budget
get
down
because
the funds
being diverted
to the
culture
activities. Nowadays, almost in all the developing
countries
in the world reluctant to divert their funds towards
art
and
culture
improvement as it has not shown any economic growth to them.
Secondly
, encouragement of the social
arts
is making the
people
on the same page. This results unity of
people
and
skills
development
as well
.
Hence
the developed
countries
, which having sufficient amounts to infrastructure
developments
can encourage.
Despite of
development
of the
country
,
government
should take initiations to
improve
the internal
arts
of
people
. This definitely
improves
population analytical thinking and sharp catching
skills
.
Finally
,
many
countries
in this regard taking initiation and getting
beautiful
results.
By concluding, The craft
arts
which
are adopted
from their
culture
to
be funded
undoubtedly
.
Since
, the improvement of the
arts
gives fruitful results along with time. In my prospective, all the
countries
have to
look in the direction of increasing the
skill
sets, which
indirectly
helps
the economic growth of the
country
.
Also
, need to take appropriate actions to
get
utilised
government
funds
properly
for the allocated works.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
34Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
9Mistakes