Nowadays, many countries are becoming supporters rather than in the last decades. Giving aids have become a fragment of the nations with each other, which is very beneficial for the nation. Certain people ponder that giving helps to the needy state has more negative impacts than positive. However, I completely disagree with this occur, as when a region invests the wages to the other space, it progresses the good relationship with each other. I deem that it has more positive than negative influences. The upcoming paragraphs will examine the both positive and negative impacts of this phenomenon.
To embark with, those people who claim that it has more negative impacts. First of all, an agrarian cannot in depend on their shoulders as well as not enjoy an autonomy, because they have to do work under the other society. With this cannot enhance the currency. Besides this, it not only impact the poor homey, but also wealthy bucolic. To cite an example, when the needy union obtains lots of money from the rich countries. Sometimes, poor countries spend all the money on their lifestyle of the people. These kind of nations are not able to return the wages back to the rich nations. Consequently, poor countries have to suffer some losses. So it has certain disadvantages.
On the contrary side, it has more positive effects of this. Since the world is smaller, more and more countries are becoming connected with other states. It develops the good relationship with each other. It also helps the poor countries. When richer state donates the salary to the needy democracy. Then the provincial can yield the jobs for the people, which stop unemployment rates of the community.
To sum up, even though it has both positive and negative influences of this occurs, yet has many advantages than disadvantages. I judge that it is very essential giving aid to the needy nations.
Nowadays,
many
countries
are becoming supporters
rather
than in the last decades. Giving aids have become a fragment of the
nations
with each
other
, which is
very
beneficial for the
nation
. Certain
people
ponder that giving
helps
to the
needy
state has more
negative
impacts
than
positive
.
However
, I completely disagree with this occur, as when a region invests the wages to the
other
space, it progresses the
good
relationship with each
other
. I deem that it has more
positive
than
negative
influences. The upcoming paragraphs will examine the both
positive
and
negative
impacts
of this phenomenon.
To embark with, those
people
who claim that it has more
negative
impacts
.
First of all
, an agrarian cannot in depend on their shoulders
as well
as not enjoy an autonomy,
because
they
have to
do work under the
other
society. With this cannot enhance the currency.
Besides
this, it not
only
impact
the
poor
homey,
but
also
wealthy bucolic. To cite an example, when the
needy
union obtains lots of money from the rich
countries
.
Sometimes
,
poor
countries
spend all the money on their lifestyle of the
people
.
These kind
of
nations
are not able to return the wages back to the rich
nations
.
Consequently
,
poor
countries
have to
suffer
some
losses.
So
it has certain disadvantages.
On the contrary
side, it has more
positive
effects of this. Since the world is smaller, more and more
countries
are becoming connected with
other
states. It develops the
good
relationship with each
other
. It
also
helps
the
poor
countries
.
When
richer state donates the salary to the
needy
democracy. Then the provincial can yield the jobs for the
people
, which
stop
unemployment rates of the community.
To sum up,
even though
it has both
positive
and
negative
influences of this occurs,
yet
has
many
advantages than disadvantages. I judge that it is
very
essential giving aid to the
needy
nations
.