While economic development is often praised as the ultimate solution for sustaining global problems like poverty and hunger, it is equally criticized by its damage caused to the environment. Both these schools of thought hold valid arguments, yet I believe that enhancing economic expansion at the expense of the environment would not be a wise choice for the human being.
Indisputably, economic growth so far has been serving effectively in eradicating famine and poverty on a global scale. Millions of children and adults, reportedly, decease every year owning to malnutrition and poverty-related consequences; thus, governments have been fighting restlessly to bring more food to people’s tables. Along with rapid economic growth, there are more and more people with better job prospects and higher salaries. In other words, more people now can afford food and satisfy their essential needs. The contribution of economic growth in battling against poverty and hunger is recognizable.
However, striving for economic development does have side effects that have been immensely damaged the environment, and it poses a threat to human survival. A plethora of environmental consequences caused by intensive focus on economic development could be named climate change, air pollution, water contamination, and loss of wildlife habitat. If these also sustaining issues are not prevented or improved, the existence of human beings would be on the verge of danger. Therefore, it is critical to put a brake on the developing global economy in order to keep the earth inhabitable.
All things considered, although economic prosperity offers effective remedies to pressing concerns such as hunger and poverty, it is inadequate to ensure environmental security. Given that, governments and individuals should make a collective effort in order to enhance the positive impact of developing economies on people’s living standards and regulate its adverse effects on the Earth.
While
economic
development is
often
praised as the ultimate solution for sustaining global problems like
poverty
and hunger, it is
equally
criticized by its damage caused to the environment. Both these schools of
thought
hold valid arguments,
yet
I believe that enhancing
economic
expansion at the expense of the environment would not be a wise choice for the human being.
Indisputably
,
economic
growth
so
far has been serving
effectively
in eradicating famine and
poverty
on a global scale. Millions of children and adults, reportedly, decease every year owning to malnutrition and poverty-related consequences;
thus
,
governments
have been fighting
restlessly
to bring more food to
people’s
tables. Along with rapid
economic
growth, there are more and more
people
with better job prospects and higher salaries.
In other words
, more
people
now
can afford food and satisfy their essential needs. The contribution of
economic
growth in battling against
poverty
and hunger is recognizable.
However
, striving for
economic
development does have side effects that have been
immensely
damaged the environment, and it poses a threat to human survival. A plethora of environmental consequences caused by intensive focus on
economic
development could
be named
climate
change
, air pollution, water contamination, and loss of wildlife habitat. If these
also
sustaining issues are not
prevented
or
improved
, the existence of human beings would be on the verge of
danger
.
Therefore
, it is critical to put a brake on the developing global economy in order to
keep
the earth inhabitable.
All things considered, although
economic
prosperity offers effective remedies to pressing concerns such as hunger and
poverty
, it is inadequate to ensure environmental security.
Given
that,
governments
and individuals should
make
a collective effort in order to enhance the
positive
impact of developing economies on
people’s
living standards and regulate its adverse effects on the Earth.