People have different views on financial support and practical aid. While some think many developing nations should be helped by global organisations, others, however, oppose this view and claims that advice is more reliable than helping financially. I agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, it is thought that financial support by external bodies is much needed for the progress of the underdeveloped countries. Because such nations do not have much budget to persist in development programs in the field of infrastructure, particularly in the remote areas. This makes such nations to rely on international bodies for the growth. Moreover, a lot of developing nations are not able to provide tertiary education to their students due to lack in funding and financial support enables them to access to university education and enlighten better job prospects in the future. It is undeniable to say financial assistance from another country is imperative; however, too much financial help make debt on underdeveloped nations and this gives me a reason to not agree with it.
On the other hand, others argue that practical advice plays an integral role in the nation’s growth. As vaccination for the prevention of disease and mechanical help actually gives an opportunity to develop a nation. For instance, India recently succeeded in the launch of a bullet train with the assistance of Japanese, undoubtedly, such practical help gives life long experience which can be continued any time for the country's progress. Moreover, it could be thought that practical aid is much more informative than financial help because financial support can be used by many politicians for their own interest instead of using for the public service, which brings corruption, poverty and crime in the nations. Due to these positive views made me agree with them.
In conclusion, although financial help from international organisations assists to educate pupils and enable rural people to take advantage of infrastructure, I believe that practical advice will be beneficial in the long run that can be useful anytime.
People
have
different
views on
financial
support
and
practical
aid. While
some
think
many
developing
nations
should be
helped
by global
organisations
, others,
however
, oppose this view and claims that advice is more reliable than helping
financially
. I
agree
with the latter view.
On the one hand, it is
thought
that
financial
support
by external bodies is
much needed
for the progress of the underdeveloped countries.
Because
such
nations
do not have
much
budget to persist in development programs in the field of infrastructure,
particularly
in the remote areas. This
makes
such
nations
to rely on international bodies for the growth.
Moreover
,
a lot of
developing
nations
are not able to provide tertiary education to their students due to lack in funding and
financial
support
enables them to access to university education and enlighten better job prospects in the future. It is undeniable to say
financial
assistance from another country is imperative;
however
, too
much
financial
help
make
debt on underdeveloped
nations
and this gives me a reason to not
agree
with it.
On the other hand
, others argue that
practical
advice plays an integral role in the
nation’s
growth. As vaccination for the prevention of disease and mechanical
help
actually gives an opportunity to develop a
nation
.
For instance
, India recently succeeded in the launch of a bullet train with the assistance of Japanese,
undoubtedly
, such
practical
help
gives life long experience which can
be continued
any time for the country's progress.
Moreover
, it could be
thought
that
practical
aid is
much
more informative than
financial
help
because
financial
support
can be
used
by
many
politicians for their
own
interest
instead
of using for the public service, which brings corruption, poverty and crime in the
nations
. Due to these
positive
views made me
agree
with them.
In conclusion
, although
financial
help
from international
organisations
assists to educate pupils and enable rural
people
to take advantage of infrastructure, I believe that
practical
advice will be beneficial in the long run that can be useful anytime.