People have different views on financial support and practical aid. While some think many developing nations should be helped by global organisations, others, however, oppose this view and claims that advice is more reliable than helping financially. I agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, it is thought that financial support by external bodies is much needed for the progress of the underdeveloped countries. Because such nations do not have much budget to persist in development programs in the field of infrastructure, particularly in the remote areas. This makes such nations to rely on international bodies for the growth. Moreover, a lot of developing nations are not able to provide tertiary education to their students due to lack in funding and financial support enables them to access to university education and enlighten better job prospects in the future. It is undeniable to say financial assistance from another country is imperative; however, too much financial help make debt on underdeveloped nations and this gives me a reason to not agree with it.
On the other hand, others argue that practical advice plays an integral role in the nation’s growth. As vaccination for the prevention of disease and mechanical help actually gives an opportunity to develop a nation. For instance, India recently succeeded in the launch of a bullet train with the assistance of Japanese, undoubtedly, such practical help gives life long experience which can be continued any time for the country's progress. Moreover, it could be thought that practical aid is much more informative than financial help because financial support can be used by many politicians for their own interest instead of using for the public service, which brings corruption, poverty and crime in the nations. Due to these positive views made me agree with them.
In conclusion, although financial help from international organisations assists to educate pupils and enable rural people to take advantage of infrastructure, I believe that practical advice will be beneficial in the long run that can be useful anytime. 
 People
 have  
different
 views on  
financial
  support
 and  
practical
 aid. While  
some
  think
  many
 developing  
nations
 should be  
helped
 by global  
organisations
, others,  
however
, oppose this view and claims that advice is more reliable than helping  
financially
. I  
agree
 with the latter view.
On the one hand, it is  
thought
 that  
financial
  support
 by external bodies is  
much needed
 for the progress of the underdeveloped countries.  
Because
 such  
nations
 do not have  
much
 budget to persist in development programs in the field of infrastructure,  
particularly
 in the remote areas. This  
makes
 such  
nations
 to rely on international bodies for the growth.  
Moreover
,  
a lot of
 developing  
nations
 are not able to provide tertiary education to their students due to lack in funding and  
financial
  support
 enables them to access to university education and enlighten better job prospects in the future. It is undeniable to say  
financial
 assistance from another country is imperative;  
however
, too  
much
  financial
  help
  make
 debt on underdeveloped  
nations
 and this gives me a reason to not  
agree
 with it. 
On the other hand
, others argue that  
practical
 advice plays an integral role in the  
nation’s
 growth. As vaccination for the prevention of disease and mechanical  
help
 actually gives an opportunity to develop a  
nation
.  
For instance
, India recently succeeded in the launch of a bullet train with the assistance of Japanese,  
undoubtedly
, such  
practical
  help
 gives life long experience which can  
be continued
 any time for the country's progress.  
Moreover
, it could be  
thought
 that  
practical
 aid is  
much
 more informative than  
financial
  help
  because
  financial
  support
 can be  
used
 by  
many
 politicians for their  
own
 interest  
instead
 of using for the public service, which brings corruption, poverty and crime in the  
nations
. Due to these  
positive
 views made me  
agree
 with them. 
In conclusion
, although  
financial
  help
 from international  
organisations
 assists to educate pupils and enable rural  
people
 to take advantage of infrastructure, I believe that  
practical
 advice will be beneficial in the long run that can be useful anytime.