In recent years, the debate that cutting-edge technology should replace the roles of museums as people tend to see historical objectives on a computer screen has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although, this trend is not without advantages, the downsides will justify these.
On the one hand, high-end technology allows all people approach masterpieces conveniently via the Internet with only a touch on the screen.
First, since many people do not have chances to visit directly memorial house to see the artefacts, online images will sufficiently satisfactory for those who have no ideas about the art works. For example, nowadays people can search and see the masterpiece, such as “Mona Lisa” picture, in their house without travelling to Paris and spending great trip budgets. Second, online exhibitions and museums offer customers remarkable services that cannot be found in the real ones. This means that instead of following strict regulations to access the museums, people have opportunities to visit sites at any time, even at night, and on their ways that not be annoyed by others.
On the other hand, there are some undeniable reasons why local authorities should maintain the memorial sites.
First, by offering first-hand experience, the visitors may sense the atmosphere of the museums as well as the tangible cultural heritage. For example, the National Gallery in London will be amazed and surprised by visitors as it looks striking and impressive building. Second, people are allowed to contemplate the masterpieces with their bare eyes. This means that the feeling of awe on seeing the size of the great dinosaur skeletons in the Natural History Museum in New York would be impossible to experience by simply looking at an image on a laptop.
In conclusion, although the advanced of technology seem to be replaced tangible museums, the roles of the memorial house should not be underrated.
In recent years, the debate that cutting-edge technology should replace the roles of
museums
as
people
tend to
see
historical objectives on a computer screen has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although, this trend is not without advantages, the downsides will justify these.
On the one hand, high-
end
technology
allows
all
people
approach masterpieces
conveniently
via the Internet with
only
a touch on the screen.
First
, since
many
people
do not have chances to visit
directly
memorial
house
to
see
the
artefacts
, online images will
sufficiently
satisfactory for those who have no
ideas
about the art works.
For example
, nowadays
people
can search and
see
the masterpiece, such as “Mona Lisa” picture, in their
house
without travelling to Paris and spending great trip budgets. Second, online exhibitions and
museums
offer customers remarkable services that cannot
be found
in the real ones. This means that
instead
of following strict regulations to access the
museums
,
people
have opportunities to visit sites at any time, even at night, and on their ways that not
be annoyed
by others.
On the other hand
, there are
some
undeniable reasons why local authorities should maintain the memorial sites.
First
, by offering
first
-hand experience, the visitors may sense the atmosphere of the
museums
as well
as the tangible cultural heritage.
For example
, the National Gallery in London will
be amazed
and surprised by visitors as it looks striking and impressive building. Second,
people
are
allowed
to contemplate the masterpieces with their bare eyes. This means that the feeling of awe on seeing the size of the great dinosaur skeletons in the Natural History
Museum
in New York would be impossible to experience by
simply
looking at an image on a laptop.
In conclusion
, although
the advanced of
technology seem to
be replaced
tangible
museums
, the roles of the memorial
house
should not
be underrated
.