The appropriate age to enter primary education is debated by parents. Some of them become de-motivated due to the mental stress that the education system imposes on young learners, but then again, many guardians, including me, found it more appropriate to start primary education before the offspring turn 7. In this essay, both the views will be discussed in the light of logic.
A student, entering primary education, gets exposed to extensive pressure, which is hard for a young person to manage. To illustrate, small children have to comply with the class lectures as well as daily homework, not to mention the punishments in case of non-compliance. Moreover, those younglings have to compete with each-other to secure better placements in the class. All these activities result in a heavy mental burden for the children which they do not find comfortable to manage. In many cases, these negative results in physical sickness as well as mental trauma.
However, like many other parents who consider the first 7 years to be the best time to learn, I believe that every child shall be oriented to schools before this age. As the young people contain a curious mind, it is the perfect time to feed their curiosity with knowledge. A research, conducted by the psychologists of Oxford University, revealed that a person is 35% more potent to learn a new language at the age of 6 than later in his life. Considering the outcome indicating potentials of a child’s brain to learn before they get older, entering them in schools before they turn 7 is justified.
To conclude, the parents have to send their loved ones to the schools, not matter what their age is. Although education system imposes heavy pressure on those young learners, we have to depend on their latent capability to learn at an early ageage of their life and let them endure the load.
The appropriate
age
to enter primary
education
is debated
by parents.
Some
of them become
de-motivated
due to the mental
stress
that the
education
system imposes on
young
learners,
but
then again,
many
guardians, including me, found it more appropriate to
start
primary
education
before
the offspring turn 7. In this essay, both the views will
be discussed
in the light of logic.
A student, entering primary
education
,
gets
exposed to extensive pressure, which is
hard
for a
young
person to manage. To illustrate,
small
children
have to
comply with the
class
lectures
as well
as daily homework, not to mention the punishments in case of non-compliance.
Moreover
, those
younglings
have to
compete with each-other to secure better placements in the
class
. All these activities result in a heavy mental burden for the children which they do not find comfortable to manage. In
many
cases, these
negative
results in physical sickness
as well
as mental trauma.
However
, like
many
other parents who consider the
first
7 years to be the best time to
learn
, I believe that every child shall
be oriented
to schools
before
this
age
. As the
young
people
contain a curious mind, it is the perfect time to feed their curiosity with knowledge. A research, conducted by the psychologists of Oxford University, revealed that a person is 35% more potent to
learn
a new language at the
age
of 6 than later in his life. Considering the outcome indicating potentials of a child’s brain to
learn
before
they
get
older, entering them in schools
before
they turn 7
is justified
.
To conclude
, the parents
have to
send
their
loved
ones to the schools, not matter what their
age
is. Although
education
system imposes heavy pressure on those
young
learners, we
have to
depend on their latent capability to
learn
at an early
ageage
of their life and
let
them endure the load.