Art is a very important part of humanity’s history, and it can be found anywhere from the walls of caves in the halls of museums. While some believe that learning art in school is not important, I side with those who feel that art is an important subject.
On the one hand, it could be argued that studying art in schools is a loose of a student's precious time. Those who support the idea of art as a non-essential subject argue that schools only provide basic art training and to enhance a student’s artistic skill parents need to enrol them in specialized training institutes. Students will learn better stills in specialized institutes rather than in schools. In short, they feel that the school should focus on imparting knowledge on essential subjects like Science, Math and Information technology. They also argue that studying art in school will not enhance the scope of employability in the future.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that learning art in institutes is not a waste of time. It is a fact that through art pupils is able to express their ideas and view more openly rather than in words. For instance, introvert students can convert their thoughts through nonverbal communication and art can be one of the means. However, my strongest argument for supporting arts in school is that children learn about their culture and history. It is easy for children to interpret the idea or thought from pictures and sculptures rather than by just reading books.
In conclusion, although the school provides only basic training in arts, leaning arts does provide children with a better understanding of their history. Therefore, on balance, I strongly believe art should be considered as an important subject of the school's curriculum.
Art
is a
very
important
part of humanity’s history, and it can
be found
anywhere from the walls of caves in the halls of museums. While
some
believe that learning
art
in
school
is not
important
, I side with those who feel that
art
is an
important
subject.
On the one hand, it could
be argued
that studying
art
in
schools
is a loose of a student's precious time. Those who support the
idea
of
art
as a non-essential subject argue that
schools
only
provide basic
art
training and to enhance a student’s artistic
skill
parents need to enrol them in specialized training institutes. Students will learn better stills in specialized institutes
rather
than in
schools
. In short, they feel that the
school
should focus on imparting knowledge on essential subjects like Science, Math and Information technology. They
also
argue that studying
art
in
school
will not enhance the scope of employability in the future.
On the other hand
, I side with those who believe that learning
art
in institutes is not a waste of time. It is a fact that through
art
pupils is able to express their
ideas
and view more
openly
rather
than in words.
For instance
, introvert students can convert their thoughts through nonverbal communication and
art
can be one of the means.
However
, my strongest argument for supporting
arts
in
school
is that children learn about their culture and history. It is easy for children to interpret the
idea
or
thought
from pictures and sculptures
rather
than by
just
reading books.
In conclusion
, although the
school
provides
only
basic training in
arts
, leaning
arts
does provide children with a better understanding of their history.
Therefore
, on balance, I
strongly
believe
art
should
be considered
as an
important
subject of the school's curriculum.