With constant modifications in school curriculum and constant changes in society the question of whether to maintain or drop geography is an interesting topic. I believe there would be severe consequences if geography were to disappear, mainly due to the understanding and open-mindedness that is derived from such studies.
Firstly, with ever more complex geopolitical strategies being played out, it can be considered extremely valuable to have the ability to identify the location of these events without checking on a map. Religious and border conflicts are amongst the most common sources of events, and a lack of knowledge as to where these events are being played out can be considered ignorant. For example, areas such as the Middle East are constantly in the news. Therefore, by being merely aware of their location in the world, readers or viewers can greatly increase their understanding of the conflict.
Secondly, making geography compulsory in the schools would most likely encourage students to travel later in life. This is because geography can bring to light options you may not have known existed previously. For example, historically England has been the top destination to learn English. However, in recent times students have learned about more economical options such as Malta or Ireland. Therefore, without a sound geographical knowledge of Europe, these options could have been overlooked.
To conclude, removing geography from the school curricula would reduce a student’s ability to fully assimilate global events in the media. Furthermore, removing the subject could indirectly reduce the amount of perceived options available to students.
With constant modifications in school curriculum and constant
changes
in society
the question of whether
to maintain or drop
geography
is an interesting topic. I believe there would be severe consequences if
geography
were to disappear,
mainly
due to the understanding and open-mindedness that
is derived
from such studies.
Firstly
, with ever more complex geopolitical strategies
being played
out, it can
be considered
extremely
valuable to have the ability to identify the location of these
events
without checking on a map. Religious and border conflicts are amongst the most common sources of
events
, and a lack of knowledge as to where these
events
are
being played
out can
be considered
ignorant.
For example
, areas such as the Middle East are
constantly
in the news.
Therefore
, by being
merely
aware of their location in the world, readers or viewers can
greatly
increase their understanding of the conflict.
Secondly
, making
geography
compulsory in the schools would most likely encourage
students
to travel later in life. This is
because
geography
can bring to light
options
you may not have known existed previously.
For example
,
historically
England has been the top destination to learn English.
However
, in recent times
students
have learned about more economical
options
such as Malta or Ireland.
Therefore
, without a sound geographical knowledge of Europe, these
options
could have
been overlooked
.
To conclude
, removing
geography
from the school curricula would
reduce
a
student’s
ability to
fully
assimilate global
events
in the media.
Furthermore
, removing the subject could
indirectly
reduce
the amount of perceived
options
available to
students
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes