To start with, there has been a several discussions about whether lawbreaker should be sent to jail or should be made to work in communities. Because this topic has wide aspects and it has its pros and cons. Although work in the community for lawbreaker looks convincing, the charge of sending them to jail is a better option. How is it ok to forgive the culprit? Therefore, Let's discuss both of the views and give the most appropriate solution.
First of all, the offender is someone who had done something wrong to the society. If they were ok with society's rules and regulations they would not have done damage to the public in the first place. As a neutral system, it is a duty of the government to maintain the balance in the community. And to do that, these people should be removed from communities so that, people who follow the laws sincerely, can live with trust in each other and live in peace. Since, Isolating criminal from the civilization has been the only option which can lead the nation on the path of progress and development it is needless to be done.
In contrast, the culprit who has broken the law can do work in communities as a reimbursement. Whereas the sentence in prison for a considerable amount of time is basically a waste of time low breaker can spend this time doing social service in communities for the betterment of both society and the Nation and also for themselves. If they will be charged with prison time, the government will also have to spend money on their basic amenities, which is the money of the normal citizen in terms of tax. Which again is damaging to the culture.
Finally, in conclusion, both the aspects have their advantages as well as disadvantages. But, to get the optimum solution for this problem, without breaking any civil rights I think it is better to let criminal spend their time in jail as the punishment, to maintain peace and balance in community.
To
start
with, there has been a several
discussions
about whether lawbreaker should be
sent
to jail or should
be made
to work in
communities
.
Because
this topic has wide aspects and it has its pros and cons. Although work in the
community
for lawbreaker looks convincing, the charge of sending them to jail is a better option. How is it ok to forgive the culprit?
Therefore
,
Let
's discuss both of the views and give the most appropriate solution.
First of all
, the offender is someone who had done something
wrong
to the society. If they were ok with society's
rules
and regulations they would not have done damage to the public in the
first
place. As a neutral system, it is a duty of the
government
to maintain the balance in the
community
. And to do that, these
people
should
be removed
from
communities
so
that,
people
who follow the laws
sincerely
, can
live
with trust in each other and
live
in peace. Since, Isolating criminal from the civilization has been the
only
option which can lead the nation on the path of progress and development it is needless to
be done
.
In contrast
, the culprit who has broken the law can do work in
communities
as a reimbursement. Whereas the sentence in prison for a considerable amount of
time
is
basically
a waste of
time
low breaker can spend this
time
doing social service in
communities
for the betterment of both society and the Nation and
also
for themselves. If they will
be charged
with prison
time
, the
government
will
also
have to
spend money on their basic amenities, which is the money of the normal citizen in terms of tax.
Which
again is damaging to the culture.
Finally
,
in conclusion
, both the aspects have their advantages
as well as
disadvantages.
But
, to
get
the optimum solution for this problem, without breaking any civil rights I
think
it is better to
let
criminal spend their
time
in jail as the punishment, to maintain peace and balance in
community
.