Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. discuss both these views and give your own opinion. v.7

People are polarized into different groups based on their opinion regarding the selection criteria of friends. Majority of people support the idea that we should always look a person as a friend who has mindset similar to us whereas some people oppose this notion. The following paragraphs will shed light on the views of both sides and my personal perspective with an act of example. A large proportion of the society thinks that to have a person as friend with same thinking helps to maintain a long lasting relation as due to same opinion the chances of fighting with each other are always on lower side. Moreover, they also support keep a companion with same ideology leads an individual to get success in each task as he receive good feedback about his efforts which generally boost the confidence. On the other hand some people those do not agree with majority of people and have different views regarding the qualities of someone which are required to make them as good friends. These people think that to have a friend with same mentality sometimes do not help them to identify their weakness either due to their personal behavior or work because when receive a negetive feedback from a close colleague then he tries to improve the weakness. Moreover, people of this group think that when they have a friend with opposite ideology then it help them to achieve better results even in worse conditions because they can work with different strategies Which make the things to complete in an easy way. I would like to say that I also agree with the view of majority of people that we should look a person with same thought process to maintain a relation. To support my opinion, I have an act of example. During my graduation, I had two friends and both were also my roommates. Though one of my friend always pointed out finger on me even in case of things were done in right way and he never spoke positively for me. However, his intentions were not good, but I felt very bad everytime after his remarks and always lost my complience to do work. On the other hand, mine other friend had same ideology as like me and he always supported me about my ideas and ways of working as he also had same views. So, every time after hearing from him, I achieved better result, because his opinion helped me to gain more confidence. Further, I felt very energetic to discuss on things to him rather than my friend with different opinion. To sum up this, I strongly agree with people that selecting a friend with same mindset is always better instead of choosing someone with different ideology.
People
are polarized
into
different
groups based on their
opinion
regarding the selection criteria of
friends
. Majority of
people
support the
idea
that we should always look a person as a
friend
who has mindset similar to us whereas
some
people
oppose this notion. The following paragraphs will shed light on the
views
of both sides and my personal perspective with an act of example.

A large proportion of the society
thinks
that to have a person as
friend
with same thinking
helps
to maintain a
long lasting
relation as due to same
opinion
the chances of fighting with each
other
are always on lower side.
Moreover
, they
also
support
keep
a companion with same
ideology
leads an individual to
get
success in each task as he
receive
good
feedback about his efforts which
generally
boost the confidence.

On the
other
hand
some
people
those do not
agree
with
majority of
people
and have
different
views
regarding the qualities of someone which
are required
to
make
them as
good
friends
. These
people
think
that to have a
friend
with same mentality
sometimes
do not
help
them to identify their weakness either due to their personal behavior or work
because
when receive a
negetive
feedback from a close colleague then he tries to
improve
the weakness.
Moreover
,
people
of this group
think
that when they have a
friend
with opposite
ideology
then it
help
them to achieve better results even in worse conditions
because
they can work with
different
strategies

Which
make
the things to complete
in an easy way
.

I would like to say that I
also
agree
with the
view
of majority of
people
that we should look a person with same
thought
process to maintain a relation. To support my
opinion
, I have an act of example.

During my graduation, I had two
friends
and both were
also
my roommates. Though one of my
friend
always pointed out finger on me even in case of things
were done
in right
way and
he never spoke
positively
for me.
However
, his intentions were not
good
,
but
I felt
very
bad
everytime
after his remarks and always lost my
complience
to do work. On the
other
hand, mine
other
friend
had same
ideology
as like
me and
he always supported me about my
ideas
and ways of working as he
also
had same
views
.
So
, every time after hearing from him, I achieved better result,
because
his
opinion
helped
me to gain more confidence.
Further
, I felt
very
energetic to discuss on things to him
rather
than my
friend
with
different
opinion.

To sum up this, I
strongly
agree
with
people
that selecting a
friend
with same mindset is always better
instead
of choosing someone with
different
ideology
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad
Show Comments
The limits of my language are the limits of my world.
Ludwig Wittgenstein

IELTS essay Some people think that it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay
  American English
7 paragraphs
458 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts