Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. v.18
Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. v. 18
Life is impossible without friends. But, it is debatable that either you find such friends who are aligned with your mental approach or those who sometimes contradict you. I personally belief that contradicting friends are the best friends, This essay will discuss this idea, using the examples of Oxford University research and Times Magazine survey to demonstrate points and support claims.
On the one hand, some people believe that if you want to live your life stress free, you find such people who agree with your beliefs and ideas. Because, if you find such friends you will not face debates in your life, which will let you down. Furthermore, you will feel more balanced in life. For example, Oxford University in 2015 researched that finding friends of same nature will reduce the chances of heart attack. So from this example, it is clear that having the company of that person who agrees with you in every sphere of life will keep you healthy and fit.
On the other hand, some people think that the debatable friends are important in life. As, you can't predict your actions that either they are right or wrong. Additionally, the company of friends who criticize when required will sometimes open new horizons of knowledge. Similarly, a survey of Time Magazine suggests the same story that people who love the company of contradicting friends becomes good researcher. So from this example, it is clear that it is important in life that we have some friends who disagree with us when we are not on right track.
To conclude, it’s good that your friends agree with all your opinions, but this sometimes derail you. So in order to avoid such complications, it’s better to find friends who sometimes debate with us when we are not on right track.
Life
is impossible without
friends
.
But
, it is debatable that either you
find
such
friends
who
are aligned
with your mental approach or those
who
sometimes
contradict you. I
personally belief
that contradicting
friends
are the best
friends
, This essay will discuss this
idea
, using the
examples
of Oxford University research and Times Magazine survey to demonstrate points and support claims.
On the one hand,
some
people
believe that if you want to
live
your
life
stress
free, you
find
such
people
who
agree
with your beliefs and
ideas
.
Because
, if you
find
such
friends
you will not face debates in your
life
, which will
let
you down.
Furthermore
, you will feel more balanced in
life
. For
example
, Oxford University in 2015 researched that finding
friends
of same nature will
reduce
the chances of heart attack.
So
from this
example
, it is
clear
that having the
company
of that person
who
agrees
with you in every sphere of
life
will
keep
you healthy and fit.
On the other hand
,
some
people
think
that the debatable
friends
are
important
in
life
. As, you can't predict your actions that either they are right or
wrong
.
Additionally
, the
company
of
friends
who
criticize when required will
sometimes
open new horizons of knowledge.
Similarly
, a survey of Time Magazine suggests the same story that
people
who
love
the
company
of contradicting
friends
becomes
good
researcher.
So
from this
example
, it is
clear
that it is
important
in
life
that we have
some
friends
who
disagree with us when we are not on right
track
.
To conclude
, it’s
good
that your
friends
agree
with all your opinions,
but
this
sometimes
derail you.
So
in order to avoid such complications, it’s better to
find
friends
who
sometimes
debate with us when we are not on right
track
.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes