It has been claimed that in this contemproray world health is not concerned as a major. Many human kinds think that officials should apply diverse methods to better healthy lifestyle of individuals, while ani-advocates suggest that keeping healthy is only in citizens response. In my aspects of illustration, this issue is becoming more indisputable than were in the past. The two controversial reflection of this argument will be analyzed below before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Firstly, government should create more opportunities for people to continue healthy lifestyle. For example, building well-equipped sport facilities and health centres can be appropriate overcome from side of officials. Additionally, special sport trainings such as jogging, running and warm-up exercisises are esteblesheb in western countries before the working proccess is started in order to make mental and physical condition balanced. Besides that, in some countries, companies allocate some time for having rest(for sleeping) during work proccess but in limited period as it is proved to be beneficial because it preserves employees from insonia. Therefore, officials make contribution to the life of citizens, especially, in the terms of health care.
However, individuals should to be a responsiable for their health. Because controlling a car is on drivers' hand as it has been enrolled. For example, articles about balanced diet are presented in many magazines and journals. Additionally, domestic easy daily exercises are recommended in these sources. Besides that, being healthy is clarified by how responsiable and punctual the person is, significantly, in doing sport activities daily. Thus, mainly people are liable in their healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion, It is clear from the arguments above that both sides have a reasonable evedence. However, individuals contribute more to health than governments do. Every person should approach different to health, comming from their own weakness
It has
been claimed
that in this
contemproray
world
health
is not concerned as a major.
Many
human kinds
think
that officials should apply diverse methods to better
healthy
lifestyle of individuals, while
ani-advocates
suggest that keeping
healthy
is
only
in citizens response. In my aspects of illustration, this issue is becoming more indisputable than were in the past. The two controversial reflection of this argument will
be analyzed
below
before
a reasoned conclusion
is drawn
.
Firstly
,
government
should create more opportunities for
people
to continue
healthy
lifestyle.
For example
, building well-equipped sport facilities and
health
centres
can be appropriate overcome from side of officials.
Additionally
, special sport trainings such as jogging, running and warm-up
exercisises
are
esteblesheb
in western countries
before
the working
proccess
is
started
in order to
make
mental and physical condition balanced.
Besides
that, in
some
countries,
companies
allocate
some
time for having rest(for sleeping) during work
proccess
but
in limited period as it
is proved
to be beneficial
because
it preserves employees from
insonia
.
Therefore
, officials
make
contribution to the life of citizens,
especially
, in the terms of
health
care.
However
, individuals should to be a
responsiable
for their
health
.
Because
controlling a car is on
drivers&
#039; hand as it has
been enrolled
.
For example
, articles about balanced diet
are presented
in
many
magazines and journals.
Additionally
, domestic easy daily exercises
are recommended
in these sources.
Besides
that, being
healthy
is clarified
by how
responsiable
and punctual the person is,
significantly
, in doing sport activities daily.
Thus
,
mainly
people
are liable in their
healthy
lifestyle.
In conclusion
, It is
clear
from the arguments above that both sides have a reasonable
evedence
.
However
, individuals contribute more to
health
than
governments
do. Every person should approach
different
to
health
,
comming
from their
own
weakness