Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people say that we should live with climate change instead of fighting with them. Do you agree or disagree? v.1

Some people say that we should live with climate change instead of fighting with them. v. 1
In recent decades, global warming has been receiving a great deal of public attention due to its sustainable impacts on human life. In my opinion, although the idea of coexistence between the climate crisis and human appears plausible, i do suppose that we should find out other practical approaches to fight with climate change instead of accepting it in the long run. There are a number of reasons why some agree with the idea of coexistence with climate change. First, since the impacts of climate change are significant, human is not strong enough to resist the law of nature. For example, Japan annually suffers from earthquakes or some coastal countries in Asia always worry about the typhoon shaped by their geographic location, thus combating climate change is in vain. Second, by harnessing the proliferation of technology or erecting solid building, supporters suggest that living with global warming is straightforward. It can be seen that geo-storm technology has allowed people minimize the worst of typhoon to the lowest level, helping save millions of lives. Nevertheless, there are a majority of reasons why the coexistence with climate change can be detrimental. First, since climate crisis is largely shaped by human-caused geo-engineering rather than nature itself, human should hold accountable for that. For example, in order to produce energy that drives the world’s economy, many nations are reliant on fossil fuels such as oil, gas and coal, which correlates with the intensification of global warming. In addition, the more climate change is exacerbated, the more big losses happen to our planet. By rising temperature, global warming can trigger the risk of the extinction of plant and animal species such as Arctic bear or seriously ruin the natural ecosystem on Earth. In conclusion, although co-living is not without advantages, the idea of tackling with climate change should be encouraged. Government authorities should take steps on global warming, to save our plant and animal species.
In recent decades,
global
warming
has been receiving a great deal of public attention due to its sustainable impacts on
human
life. In my opinion, although the
idea
of coexistence between the
climate
crisis and
human
appears plausible,
i
do suppose that we should find out other practical approaches to fight with
climate
change
instead
of accepting it in the long run.

There are a number of reasons why
some
agree
with the
idea
of coexistence with
climate
change
.
First
, since the impacts of
climate
change
are significant,
human
is not strong
enough
to resist the law of nature.
For example
, Japan
annually
suffers from earthquakes or
some
coastal countries in Asia always worry about the typhoon shaped by their geographic location,
thus
combating
climate
change
is in vain. Second, by harnessing the proliferation of technology or erecting solid building, supporters suggest that living with
global
warming
is straightforward. It can be
seen
that
geo-storm
technology has
allowed
people
minimize the worst of typhoon to the lowest level, helping save millions of
lives
.

Nevertheless
, there are a
majority
of reasons why the coexistence with
climate
change
can be detrimental.
First
, since
climate
crisis is
largely
shaped by human-caused
geo-engineering
rather
than nature itself,
human
should hold accountable for that.
For example
, in order to produce energy that drives the world’s economy,
many
nations are reliant on fossil fuels such as oil, gas and coal, which correlates with the intensification of
global
warming
.
In addition
, the more
climate
change
is exacerbated
, the more
big
losses happen to our planet. By rising temperature,
global
warming
can trigger the
risk
of the extinction of plant and animal species such as Arctic bear or
seriously
ruin the natural ecosystem on Earth.

In conclusion
, although co-living is not without advantages, the
idea
of tackling with
climate
change
should
be encouraged
.
Government
authorities should take steps on
global
warming
, to save our plant and animal species.
10Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
30Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people say that we should live with climate change instead of fighting with them. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
320 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts