With the rise in the environmental issues in today's world, many people believe that these issues should be dealt with on a global level while others believe them to be taken care of in individual countries. Although taking care of environmental issues on a global level has many advantages, but the benefits of nationally solving these issues cannot be overlooked.
Firstly, Different countries involved in solving environmental issues could bring different ideas and techniques to the table. Every country accelerates in different spheres of science and technology, hence, their capabilities can prove to be very effective in solving major environmental crisis. Furthermore, different countries coming together to solve the environmental issues could bring more financial sustainability in order to troubleshoot these issues. Take, Countries America with the biggest economy, could help building a good financial ground for researching on these issues.
On the contrary, Individual countries have more power on their public. Each country could examine their environmental issues and work individually to put actions and methods in place so that people are forced to work against the environmental degradation. Given that each country has more visibility on the internal issues such as water pollution, air pollution, the government could analyse the issues appropriately. Along with that, individual countries could impose these solutions fairly easily than their implementation on a global level.
Finally in my view, tackling issues, global and nationally hold equal importance when implied based on the severity and destruction of the issues. Many issues such as global warming impacts the entire planet and requires a lot of financial and scientific grounds to be dealt with whereas issues such as water pollution could be examined and demolished nationally via following some strict rules.
With the rise in the
environmental
issues
in
today
's world,
many
people
believe that these
issues
should
be dealt
with on a
global
level while others believe them to
be taken
care of in individual
countries
. Although taking care of
environmental
issues
on a
global
level has
many
advantages,
but
the benefits of
nationally
solving these
issues
cannot
be overlooked
.
Firstly
,
Different
countries
involved in solving
environmental
issues
could bring
different
ideas
and techniques to the table. Every
country
accelerates in
different
spheres of science and technology,
hence
, their capabilities can prove to be
very
effective in solving major
environmental
crisis.
Furthermore
,
different
countries
coming together to solve the
environmental
issues
could bring more financial sustainability in order to troubleshoot these
issues
. Take,
Countries
America with the biggest economy, could
help
building
a
good
financial ground for researching on these issues.
On the contrary
, Individual
countries
have more power on their public. Each
country
could examine their
environmental
issues
and work
individually
to put actions and methods in place
so
that
people
are forced
to work against the
environmental
degradation.
Given
that each
country
has more visibility on the internal
issues
such as water pollution, air pollution, the
government
could
analyse
the
issues
appropriately
. Along with that, individual
countries
could impose these solutions
fairly
easily
than their implementation on a
global
level.
Finally
in my view, tackling
issues
,
global
and
nationally
hold equal importance when implied based on the severity and destruction of the
issues
.
Many
issues
such as
global
warming impacts the entire planet and requires
a lot of
financial and scientific grounds to
be dealt
with whereas
issues
such as water pollution could
be examined
and demolished
nationally
via following
some
strict
rules
.