The issue has ignited a controversy among people about the responsibility of saving environment. Where a few people opine that government should be responsible for it simultaneously opponent feel that individuals must take initiative to save the surroundings. This essay will firstly discuss the both views in detail and then it will describe my own hypothesis along with conclusion.
little section of society feel that government may take the responsibility to solve the environmental issues. Authorities can introduce strict laws to follow in terms of rescuing the environment. For example; the companies, those lack their own waste management facilities, can be closed down by the governments only. This approach will surely work in protecting the planet from water pollution and air pollution.
Another approach can be the banning of plastic bags which increase the soil pollution because these bags are non-degradeable. To better exemplify, goverment of India has restricted the use of plastic bags because the use of them cause the death of many animals which eat them. Now everyone in that country avoid using plastic bags after the law.
On the other hand, we must be responsible to take care of the nature because we have destroyed it with our activities. We can save the habitat by planting more trees around our houses that we have cut down for the sake of development. Such as for making big shopping malls, housing societies, factories and many more. Hence, it is our prime role to play without any law enforcement to put our hard efforts to make the climate clean and green.
In conclusion, different people hold different opinion about saving the environment. But I strongly believe that government has better role to play in saving the environment.
The issue has ignited a controversy among
people
about the responsibility of saving
environment
. Where a few
people
opine that
government
should be responsible for it
simultaneously
opponent feel that individuals
must
take initiative to save the surroundings. This essay will
firstly
discuss the both views in detail and then it will
describe
my
own
hypothesis along with conclusion.
little
section of society feel that
government
may take the responsibility to solve the environmental issues. Authorities can introduce strict laws to follow in terms of rescuing the
environment
.
For example
; the
companies
, those lack their
own
waste management facilities, can
be closed
down by the
governments
only
. This approach will
surely
work in protecting the planet from water pollution and air pollution.
Another approach can be the banning of plastic
bags
which increase the soil pollution
because
these
bags
are
non-degradeable
. To better exemplify,
goverment
of India has restricted the
use
of plastic
bags
because
the
use
of them cause the death of
many
animals which eat them.
Now
everyone in that country avoid using plastic
bags
after the law.
On the other hand
, we
must
be responsible to take care of the nature
because
we have
destroyed
it with our activities. We can save the habitat by planting more trees around our
houses
that we have
cut
down for the sake of development. Such as for making
big
shopping malls, housing societies, factories and
many
more.
Hence
, it is our prime role to play without any law enforcement to put our
hard
efforts to
make
the climate clean and green.
In conclusion
,
different
people
hold
different
opinion about saving the
environment
.
But
I
strongly
believe that
government
has better role to play in saving the
environment
.