With the advancement in technology and globalisation, every facet of life has transformed and food habits are no exception. Since the beginning of recorded time, people are known hunters, on account of their necessity to food; however, with the revolution in civilisation, there are vehement disputes on prohibiting non-vegetarian cuisine. I believe, meat is an indispensable component of our diets and must not be banned. This opinion is surrounded by various rationales.
To begin with, food items prepared by animal's flesh are known for nutritious ingredients that are almost denied in vegetables. Admittedly, the profuse quantity of unsaturated fats such as Omega-3 is found in red meat only. Broadly speaking, Omega-3 is only fat which is not dissolvable in the body and it is propitious for human health. Thus, eroding non-vegetarian from diets is not beneficial. In addition, animals are vital constituents of the food cycle. Evidently, wilds are a major component of food cycle on earth; therefore they must be utilised to maintain the appropriate balance in the cycle. For an instance, if wild animals are removed from the cycle, the earth will become abundant with animals which may be harmful to nature. Moreover, turning vegetarian will require almost 1/3 of the earth's vegetation to be utilised per year. Thus, migrating towards non-vegetarian food is not providential for earth and denizens.
To sum up, on account of the availability of highly nutritious elements and its presence in food-cycle, it is broadly impossible to remove meat from diet and it's utilisation in diet must be encouraged to retain the natural habitat of earth.
With the advancement in technology and
globalisation
, every facet of life has transformed and
food
habits are no exception. Since the beginning of recorded time,
people
are known
hunters, on account of their necessity to
food
;
however
, with the revolution in
civilisation
, there are vehement disputes on prohibiting non-vegetarian cuisine. I believe, meat is an indispensable component of our diets and
must
not
be banned
. This opinion
is surrounded
by various rationales.
To
begin
with,
food
items prepared by animal's flesh
are known
for nutritious ingredients that are almost denied in vegetables.
Admittedly
, the profuse quantity of unsaturated fats such as Omega-3
is found
in red meat
only
.
Broadly
speaking, Omega-3 is
only
fat
which is not
dissolvable
in the body and it is propitious for human health.
Thus
, eroding non-vegetarian from diets is not beneficial.
In addition
, animals are vital constituents of the
food
cycle
.
Evidently
, wilds are a major component of
food
cycle
on
earth
;
therefore
they
must
be
utilised
to maintain the appropriate balance in the
cycle
. For an instance, if wild animals
are removed
from the
cycle
, the
earth
will become abundant with animals which may be harmful to nature.
Moreover
, turning vegetarian will require almost 1/3 of the earth's vegetation to be
utilised
per year.
Thus
, migrating towards non-vegetarian
food
is not providential for
earth
and denizens.
To sum up, on account of the availability of
highly
nutritious elements and its presence in food-cycle, it is
broadly
impossible to remove meat from diet and it's
utilisation
in diet
must
be encouraged
to retain the natural habitat of
earth
.