Some people say that in all levels of education too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? v.3
Some people say that in all levels of education too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. v. 3
Learning history is by far the most decisive factor among students. Some people agree that students should be taught local history than world history. This essay will outline with this statement. This is because, student has to comment past and future events by the help of history, and It will be develop his opinion about world.
First of all, it is true that nation's history allows school children to understand the past, and gives an idea at the present time. They can learn important information from their grandfathers, teachers or especially historical places. For example, there is an activity that Turkish school children are taken to Anıtkabir, Çanakkale which are significant for Turkish Nation. What is more, students can better know their ancestors what they did past, and what we should do. As a result, this situation might have had deeply effect on them to adopt his country’s value.
On the other hand, studying in world instead of local history might bring numerous bad effects. This information must give students, but they must be limited. When they get knowledge, people can ignore their history, and feel a plenty of admiration another country’s past. To illustrate, any country does not want to teach history of fascism in school. The reason is that they are scared to influence students who like to become a Hitler or Benito Mussolini.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that students should spend more time in nation history instead of history of world because that will change your idea where my country position is in the world, and improve judge skills.
Learning
history
is by far the most decisive factor among
students
.
Some
people
agree
that
students
should
be taught
local
history
than
world
history
. This essay will outline with this statement. This is
because
,
student
has to
comment
past
and future
events
by the
help
of
history
, and It will be
develop
his opinion about world.
First of all
, it is true that nation's
history
allows
school children to understand the
past
, and gives an
idea
at the present time. They can learn
important
information from their grandfathers, teachers or
especially
historical places.
For example
, there is an activity that Turkish school children
are taken
to
Anıtkabir
,
Çanakkale
which are significant for Turkish Nation.
What is more
,
students
can better know their ancestors what they did
past
, and what we should do.
As a result
, this situation might have had
deeply
effect on them to adopt his
country’s
value.
On the other hand
, studying in
world
instead
of local
history
might bring numerous
bad
effects. This information
must
give
students
,
but
they
must
be limited
. When they
get
knowledge,
people
can
ignore
their
history
, and feel a
plenty
of admiration another
country’s
past
. To illustrate, any
country
does not want to teach
history
of fascism in school. The reason is that they
are scared
to influence
students
who like to become a Hitler or Benito Mussolini.
In conclusion
, I
firmly
agree
that
students
should spend more time in nation
history
instead
of
history
of
world
because
that will
change
your
idea
where my
country
position is in the
world
, and
improve
judge
skills
.
10Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
29Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes