Traditionally, a good education has been the main asset of fresh graduates in job hunting process. However, it is true that even the best education can not replace a real experience, because nowadays, the curriculums are more based on teaching the theoretical aspects rather than practical applications of the knowledge.
In the first place, most school programs and university courses lack the environment where the pupils or students would get hands-on-work experience. This is understandable, since the hours allocated for each discipline in such learning centers are too limited to focus on the practical sides of things, which can take years to fully gain. For example, a student majoring in management needs a lot of years to absorb the true management skills in a rapidly changing business environment. Nor can human resources student fully acquire the real sense of recruitment process and define the right candidate for the company needs without trial and failure which he or she will not be able to do during study years.
Secondly, very often tutors themselves do not have the required practical skills and universities would need a complex and hard work of engaging the business leaders or subject matter experts who can deliver the practical sessions. Involvement of these experts, in turn, proves to be very expensive depending on the caliber and experience of person and again will be limited in time. The former presidents, prime ministers or Chief executive Officers who charge massive funds for their speeches or workshops can be regarded as good examples.
In summary, practice-based teaching is a difficult task that requires plenty of time and money investment from the education providers. Although, the top colleges and universities to some extent include in their courses such teaching methods they are not sufficient to prepare the graduates for their future work environment.
Traditionally
, a
good
education has been the main asset of fresh graduates in job hunting process.
However
, it is true that even the best education can not replace a real experience,
because
nowadays, the curriculums are more based on teaching the theoretical aspects
rather
than
practical
applications of the knowledge.
In the
first
place, most school programs and university courses lack the environment where the pupils or students would
get
hands-on-work experience. This is understandable, since the hours allocated for each discipline in such learning centers are too limited to focus on the
practical
sides of things, which can take years to
fully
gain.
For example
, a student majoring in management needs
a lot of
years to absorb the true management
skills
in a
rapidly
changing business environment. Nor can human resources student
fully
acquire the real sense of recruitment process and define the right candidate for the
company
needs without trial and failure which he or she will not be able to do during study years.
Secondly
,
very
often
tutors themselves do not have the required
practical
skills
and universities would need a complex and
hard
work of engaging the business leaders or
subject matter experts
who can deliver the
practical
sessions. Involvement of these experts, in turn, proves to be
very
expensive depending on the caliber and experience of person and again will
be limited
in time. The former presidents, prime ministers or Chief executive Officers who charge massive funds for their speeches or workshops can
be regarded
as
good
examples.
In summary, practice-based teaching is a difficult task that requires
plenty
of time and money investment from the education providers. Although, the top colleges and universities to
some
extent
include in their courses such teaching methods they are not sufficient to prepare the graduates for their future work environment.