Whether the historical structures should be demolished or conserved, is always argued among various sections of people. Some of them consider them prominent landmarks whereas others ponder that they are useless. In this essay, both viewpoints will be looked at and critically evaluated before a final conclusion can be drawn.
On the one hand, the individuals who believe that traditional buildings are worthwhile to recognize their vital role in a nation's arrests. This is because a particular country that has its unique identification only due to its cultural heritage across the globe. For example, tourists throughout the world travel to different places just to experience alternative traditional values and ancient ways of life. Thus, the unique significance of a country will become absolute if its historical assets are destroyed.
However, there are few people whole vehemently contend the preservability of conventional buildings. Probably, they are concerned for the tremendous growth of demands of the contemporary world because sources are limited and the population is growing at a rapid rate. To illustrate, if a city is congested and there are numerous unused constructions occupying a huge space, then, certainly it would be a wise decision to raze them in order to facilitate the city-dwellers with a new residential area. Hence, whenever the redundant place can be made more productive for the welfare of the inhabitants, the authorities must not remain reluctant to utilize it.
Having considered each side of the argument, I am of the opinion that, undoubtedly, old edifices possess precious and priceless historical value; if they are obstructing the smooth functioning of the society, it may be unwise to protect the
Whether the historical structures should
be demolished
or conserved, is always argued among various sections of
people
.
Some
of them consider them prominent landmarks whereas others ponder that they are useless. In this essay, both viewpoints will
be looked
at and
critically
evaluated
before
a final conclusion can
be drawn
.
On the one hand, the individuals who believe that traditional buildings are worthwhile to recognize their vital role in a nation's arrests. This is
because
a particular country that has its unique identification
only
due to its cultural heritage across the globe.
For example
, tourists throughout the world travel to
different
places
just
to experience alternative traditional values and ancient ways of life.
Thus
, the unique significance of a country will become absolute if its historical assets are
destroyed
.
However
, there are few
people
whole
vehemently
contend the
preservability
of conventional buildings.
Probably
, they
are concerned
for the tremendous growth of demands of the contemporary world
because
sources
are limited
and the population is growing at a rapid rate. To illustrate, if a city
is congested
and there are numerous unused constructions occupying a huge space, then,
certainly
it would be a wise decision to raze them in order to facilitate the city-dwellers with a new residential area.
Hence
, whenever the redundant place can
be made
more productive for the welfare of the inhabitants, the authorities
must
not remain reluctant to utilize it.
Having considered each side of the argument, I am of the opinion that,
undoubtedly
,
old
edifices possess precious and priceless historical value; if they are obstructing the smooth functioning of the society, it may be unwise to protect the