Although traditional transportation mode such as busses and trains are fast and efficient, some people preferred the energy-saving methods like bicycles and even hybrid cars that incorporate advanced technology. My preference gravitates toward energy-saving vehicles. This is because they are more environmentally friendly and therefore eligible for government incentives.
The term “energy-saving” itself denotes not consuming non-renewable resources, such as fuel that takes millions of years to form. Reportedly depleting fast from Earth, fuel is evidently not a sustainable approach to maintain the transportation system. To date, the most reliable alternative is to use renewable resources such as hydropower that converts water current to electricity. This gives birth to hybrid cars that feed partially on fuel and electricity. Bicycles, on the other hand, does not consume any energy at all as they operate manually. These are part of an ongoing effort to save the environment that thus prevents rapid depletion.
The awareness to preserve our Earth resources was accepted at a global scale. Many countries have now agreed to a common goal to use Earth resources wisely. That being said, countries are now advocating for extensive use of “energy-saving” appliances and transport. One of the initiatives is to provide incentives to these environmental-friendly users. For instance, charging ports and reserved parking lots for hybrid cars are widely available in Australia. The Australian government even provided cheap bicycle rental systems throughout the country, which in turn encourages the public to fully utilise the bicycles.
To conclude, there is a myriad of benefits to “energy-saving” mode of transportation as opposed to its traditional counterpart. I helmed the government’s efforts by choosing the former, as it saves the environment and subject to government initiatives.
Although traditional transportation mode such as busses and trains are
fast
and efficient,
some
people
preferred the energy-saving methods like bicycles and even hybrid cars that incorporate advanced technology. My preference gravitates toward energy-saving vehicles. This is
because
they are more
environmentally
friendly and
therefore
eligible for
government
incentives.
The term “energy-saving” itself denotes not consuming non-renewable resources, such as fuel that takes millions of years to form. Reportedly depleting
fast
from Earth, fuel is
evidently
not a sustainable approach to maintain the transportation system. To date, the most reliable alternative is to
use
renewable resources such as hydropower that converts water
current
to electricity. This gives birth to hybrid cars that feed
partially
on fuel and electricity. Bicycles,
on the other hand
, does not consume any energy at all as they operate
manually
. These are part of an ongoing effort to save the environment that
thus
prevents
rapid depletion.
The awareness to preserve our Earth resources was
accepted
at a global scale.
Many
countries have
now
agreed
to a common goal to
use
Earth resources
wisely
. That
being said
, countries are
now
advocating for extensive
use
of “energy-saving” appliances and transport. One of the initiatives is to provide incentives to these environmental-friendly users.
For instance
, charging ports and reserved parking lots for hybrid cars are
widely
available in Australia. The Australian
government
even provided
cheap
bicycle rental systems throughout the country, which in turn encourages the public to
fully
utilise
the bicycles.
To conclude
, there is a myriad of benefits to “energy-saving” mode of transportation as opposed to its traditional counterpart. I helmed the
government’s
efforts by choosing the former, as it saves the environment and subject to
government
initiatives.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
4Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes