some people prefer to eat at food stands and resturants. Other people prefer to prepare andeat food at home. Which do you prefer? use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. v.1
some people prefer to eat at food stands and resturants. Other people prefer to prepare andeat food at home. Which do you prefer? use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. v. 1
Employees are obliged to go through various stages of selection process nowadays. Of which, face - to - face or online interaction with the employer is very common. In my opinion, interviews are not completely reliable to measure the ability of a prospective worker. The selection process should involve certain other stages like practical skill test, group discussion and written tests.
While considering the benefits of interviews, it is an effective method. It does not require much time to analyse personal traits. Additionally, it will avoid prompts as the candidate has to answer the question on the spot. It can also analyse how a person can handle stress, anxiety and pressure. However, the qualities like social interaction, leadership, problem solving skills and above all, the practical knowledge in the trait should be analysed before appointing an employee. In such a scenario, interviews are futile. There are better alternatives such as group discussions, written test and practical skills that can analyse the above mentioned qualities.
The best method to choose an employee is through designing a selection procedure. To be more clear, a system based on the necessities of a firm coupled with the skills that are expected from a future employee. For instance, the selection process of multinational companies involves various stages like written test, group discussion, skill set test and finally, interviews. Such a process brings out the best employees for a company, even though the process is time consuming.
In conclusion, although interviews are considered as the optimum method of selection for a job, there are several measures that can be adopted to choose good employees.
Employees
are obliged
to go through various stages of
selection
process
nowadays. Of which, face
-
to
-
face or online interaction with the employer is
very
common. In my opinion,
interviews
are not completely reliable to measure the ability of a prospective worker. The
selection
process
should involve certain other stages like practical
skill
test
, group discussion and written
tests
.
While considering the benefits of
interviews
, it is an effective method. It does not require much time to
analyse
personal traits.
Additionally
, it will avoid prompts as the candidate
has to
answer the question on the spot. It can
also
analyse
how a person can handle
stress
, anxiety and pressure.
However
, the qualities like social interaction, leadership, problem solving
skills
and
above all
, the practical knowledge in the trait should be
analysed
before
appointing an
employee
. In such a scenario,
interviews
are futile. There are better alternatives such as group discussions, written
test
and practical
skills
that can
analyse
the above mentioned qualities.
The best method to choose an
employee
is through designing a
selection
procedure. To be more
clear
, a system based on the necessities of a firm coupled with the
skills
that are
expected
from a future
employee
.
For instance
, the
selection
process
of multinational
companies
involves various stages like written
test
, group discussion,
skill
set
test
and
finally
,
interviews
. Such a
process
brings out the best
employees
for a
company
,
even though
the
process
is
time consuming
.
In conclusion
, although
interviews
are considered
as the optimum method of
selection
for a job, there are several measures that can
be adopted
to choose
good
employees
.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes