In the modern era, the media is an integral part of our life because it provides the information about the whole world. Some folks believe that the media have the right to broadcast the confidential life of the people but others are against it. This essay will discuss both prospects in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, some people think that the media are entitled to uncover human’s private life. There are two advantages for this purpose. Firstly, it reveals there would be no censored information in the media like newspaper, television and the internet. However, the sense of freedom will be increased among the citizens. That is how the trust appears in the society. Secondly, this will have an effect on the improvement of the community behaviour. Juveniles are looking for the imitation from the celebrities. For instance, many directors and producers tend into making variety genres of movies, concerning prominent and reputable persons.
On the other hand, claiming the coverage of the personal lives by the media has both merits and drawbacks. A different kind of social damages would be prohibited. As a result, the cyber criminals might be controlled. For instance, frauds that are related to identification thievery and bank robberies, that is why such these crimes will possibly be prevented. A negative idea is that, the number of the false rumours will be raised. Journalists certainly write news on their own benefits. That is because the community would be impressed by Economical and political gossips that stimulate the people’s interest.
In conclusion, many people experience conflicts over the media showcase. I believe the media have the right to publicize the personal lives of individuals because it motivates some people. However, others think it ought to be censored.
In the modern era, the
media
is an integral part of our life
because
it provides the information about the whole world.
Some
folks believe that the
media
have the right to broadcast the confidential life of the
people
but
others are against it. This essay will discuss both prospects in the following paragraphs.
To
begin
with,
some
people
think
that the
media
are entitled
to uncover human’s private life. There are two advantages for this purpose.
Firstly
, it reveals there would be no censored information in the
media
like newspaper, television and the internet.
However
, the sense of freedom will
be increased
among the citizens.
That is
how the trust appears in the society.
Secondly
, this will have an effect on the improvement of the community
behaviour
. Juveniles are looking for the imitation from the celebrities.
For instance
,
many
directors and producers tend into making variety genres of movies, concerning prominent and reputable persons.
On the other hand
, claiming the coverage of the personal
lives
by the
media
has both merits and drawbacks. A
different
kind of social damages would
be prohibited
.
As a result
, the cyber criminals might
be controlled
.
For instance
, frauds that
are related
to identification thievery and bank robberies,
that is
why such these crimes will
possibly
be
prevented
. A
negative
idea
is that, the number of the false
rumours
will
be raised
. Journalists
certainly
write news on their
own
benefits.
That is
because
the community would
be impressed
by Economical and political gossips that stimulate the
people’s
interest.
In conclusion
,
many
people
experience conflicts over the
media
showcase. I believe the
media
have the right to publicize the personal
lives
of individuals
because
it motivates
some
people
.
However
, others
think
it ought to
be censored
.