Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.3

Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. v. 3
Although, there is no doubt that the tendency of using excessive packaging material among makers and suppliers is increasing, for reduction, it is important to determine the responsibilities. Some people believe that the onus is on the consumers to boycott such products, I support the view that more efforts should be made by companies. On one hand, people who advocate to avoid such items with unnecessary packaging may argue that the buyers should not get lured by the display. This is because, well exhibit products with high-cost materials like cases and boxes might create temptation, however, in the end the item gets costlier due to such marketing tactics. For example, few everyday products like toothpaste vary in prices from different companies, but manufacturers like "Coalgate" uses a thicker tube and causes more expense to the users. In contrast, implementing smart buying techniques such as selecting products with cheaper packaging can save money and as a result, money could be utilized for better investment prospects such as mutual funds and equities and also could be used in occurrences of emergencies like medical. On the other hand, I would argue that responsibility on production houses and distributors is paramount due to phenomenon of environmental intoxication. The latter argument, which many environmentalists would agree that processes of creating packaging items emits carbon dioxide and a few materials could be non-recyclable. For example, production of plastics discharge intoxicants and plastic-bags such as 50 microns and less could never be recycled. If, instead, emerging utilization of paper-bags and paper-boxes could save the further damage caused by plastics and as an outcome in the foreseeable future, the effects of global warming and greenhouse might get stabled. In conclusion, while ignoring goods with eye-catching attractions might be vital and imperative, I believe lowering the usage of needless materials and taking care of the environment should be the priority of industries because they have more liability in causing deterioration.
Although, there is no doubt that the tendency of using excessive
packaging
material
among makers and suppliers is increasing, for reduction, it is
important
to determine the responsibilities.
Some
people
believe that the onus is on the consumers to boycott such
products
, I support the view that more efforts should
be made
by
companies
.

On one hand,
people
who advocate to avoid such items with unnecessary
packaging
may argue that the buyers should not
get
lured by the display. This is
because
, well exhibit
products
with high-cost
materials
like cases and boxes might create temptation,
however
, in the
end
the item
gets
costlier due to such marketing tactics.
For example
, few everyday
products
like toothpaste vary in prices from
different
companies
,
but
manufacturers like
"
Coalgate
"
uses
a thicker tube and causes more expense to the users.
In contrast
, implementing smart buying techniques such as selecting
products
with cheaper
packaging
can save money and
as a result
, money could
be utilized
for better investment prospects such as mutual funds and equities and
also
could be
used
in occurrences of emergencies like medical.

On the other hand
, I would argue that responsibility on production
houses
and distributors is paramount due to phenomenon of environmental intoxication. The latter argument, which
many
environmentalists would
agree
that processes of creating
packaging
items emits carbon dioxide and a few
materials
could be non-recyclable.
For example
, production of plastics discharge intoxicants and plastic-bags such as 50 microns and less could never
be recycled
. If,
instead
, emerging utilization of paper-bags and paper-boxes could save the
further
damage caused by plastics and as an outcome in the foreseeable future, the effects of global warming and greenhouse might
get
stabled.

In conclusion
, while ignoring
goods
with eye-catching attractions might be vital and imperative, I believe lowering the usage of needless
materials
and taking care of the environment should be the priority of industries
because
they have more liability in causing deterioration.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. v. 3

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
321 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts