Nowadays, in some high schools scholars are allowed to blame their tutors for their method of teaching. Some say that this strategy can improve the quality of training; however, others, including myself, believe that its advantages outweigh the benefits being earned from this system because teaching will become less effective, the rate of offence will increase and more budgets will be needed for education.
Obviously, I give a green light to those believing that students should not be involved in teaching because of three important reasons. One is that following this method, the quality of education can drop. Definitely, rules are extremely important for controlling of students because many of them do not have enough experience about teaching, reducing the educational performance thoroughly. For example, had our principal allowed us to give our opinion about practical physic lessons, we would not have learned the detail of them. We understood that our physic trainer had been one of the best ones in this course; however, had we allowed to have challenges with him, we would have missed him.
Another reason behind it is that the rate of violence can increase markedly. Students feel more freedom in other aspects of their life when their opinions are valued in this area, and their behaviours will become less controllable. This group can become more aggressive in the workplace, university or even in their relations to other citizens. However, when they face some restrictions during this stage in their life, they become more probable law-abiding citizens.
Lastly, the cost of education can increase. Admittedly, this method of education will become more costly because students always consider the quality of teaching, while the expenses must be included in the new changes. For instance, if an instructor, having one-year training contract, is banned by students to teach them, he will receive the total salary. Authorities usually consider all aspects of education, including finance, and budget.
In conclusion, although some people might agree that students’ opinions should be valued by authorities, I personally believe that this is not a perfect method. Having a better control by the administration, the rate of violation among students and education expenses will decrease, and authorities will have a better control on the efficacy of training system.
Nowadays, in
some
high schools scholars are
allowed
to blame their tutors for their
method
of
teaching
.
Some
say that this strategy can
improve
the quality of training;
however
, others, including myself, believe that its advantages outweigh the benefits
being earned
from this system
because
teaching
will
become
less effective, the rate of
offence
will increase and more budgets will
be needed
for education.
Obviously
, I give a green light to those believing that
students
should not
be involved
in
teaching
because
of three
important
reasons. One is that following this
method
, the quality of
education
can drop. Definitely,
rules
are
extremely
important
for controlling of
students
because
many
of them do not have
enough
experience about
teaching
, reducing the educational performance
thoroughly
.
For example
, had our principal
allowed
us to give our opinion about practical physic lessons, we would not have learned the detail of them. We understood that our physic trainer had been one of the best ones in this course;
however
, had we
allowed
to have challenges with him, we would have missed him.
Another reason behind it is that the rate of violence can increase
markedly
.
Students
feel more freedom in other aspects of their life when their opinions
are valued
in this area, and their
behaviours
will
become
less controllable. This group can
become
more aggressive in the workplace, university or even in their relations to other citizens.
However
, when they face
some
restrictions during this stage in their life, they
become
more probable law-abiding citizens.
Lastly
, the cost of
education
can increase.
Admittedly
, this
method
of
education
will
become
more costly
because
students
always consider the quality of
teaching
, while the expenses
must
be included
in the new
changes
.
For instance
, if an instructor, having one-year training contract,
is banned
by
students
to teach them, he will receive the total salary. Authorities
usually
consider all aspects of
education
, including finance, and budget.
In conclusion
, although
some
people
might
agree
that
students’
opinions should
be valued
by authorities, I
personally
believe that this is not a perfect
method
. Having a better control by the administration, the rate of violation among
students
and
education
expenses will decrease, and authorities will have a better control on the efficacy of training system.