It is thought by some that urging children to abandon their family home at an early age is beneficial. Others believe that it is better if they stay longer with their families. In my opinion staying longer has many advantages.
There are several reasons why people might argue that leaving at an early age is helpful for youngsters.
Firstly, they learn some new skills which are the dispensable part of living alone. For example cooking, which is inevitable in each home. Secondly, they have to pay their living expenses as they are responsible for it by their own. In doing so, they must apply their knowledge that they have learned to find an appropriate job. Finally, if they leave their family home at an early age, it will reduce the financial burden of their parents who might be on the verge of retirement.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that staying with parents more longer is beneficial. The main benefit is that they will be protected by their parents. They are in danger as they are not wise enough to be able to distinguish between people who really like them or people who want to deceive them. Another reason for this opinion is that parent are powerful resources of experiences and transferring these precious experiences needs time. If children stay longer there will be more time to grab these opportunities and learn them. The last but not the least is parent’s needs that ignoring them is not fair. Children can be helped hands in some affairs and supporting their parents is more probable when they are near their families.
Having considered both sides of the issue, I would argue that the advantages of staying longer with parents outweigh the benefits of leaving at an early age. This is because the supportive, secure and nurturing environment of home can result in children who are more successful.
It is
thought
by
some
that urging
children
to abandon their family home at an
early
age
is beneficial. Others believe that it is better if they stay
longer
with their families. In my opinion staying
longer
has
many
advantages.
There are several reasons why
people
might argue that leaving at an
early
age
is helpful for youngsters.
Firstly
, they learn
some
new
skills
which are the dispensable part of living alone.
For example
cooking, which is inevitable in each home.
Secondly
, they
have to
pay their living expenses as they are responsible for it by their
own
. In doing
so
, they
must
apply their knowledge that they have learned to find an appropriate job.
Finally
, if they
leave
their family home at an
early
age
, it will
reduce
the financial burden of their
parents
who
might be on the verge of retirement.
In spite of
the above arguments, I support the view that staying with
parents
more
longer
is beneficial. The main benefit is that they will
be protected
by their
parents
. They are in
danger
as they are not wise
enough
to be able to distinguish between
people
who
really
like them or
people
who
want to deceive them. Another reason for this opinion is that
parent
are powerful resources of experiences and transferring these precious experiences needs time. If
children
stay
longer
there will be more time to grab these opportunities and learn them. The last
but
not the least is
parent’s
needs that ignoring them is not
fair
.
Children
can be
helped
hands in
some
affairs and supporting their
parents
is more probable when they are near their families.
Having considered both sides of the issue, I would argue that the advantages of staying
longer
with
parents
outweigh the benefits of leaving at an
early
age
. This is
because
the supportive, secure and nurturing environment of home can result in
children
who
are more successful.