Central and local goverments make a frantic atempt to promote festivals to create a lof revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? v.1
Central and local goverments make a frantic atempt to promote festivals to create a lof revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor. with this statement? v. 1
There is no doubt that it is important to consider how governments should spend its money. Although some people think that train lines should be given the priority in the governmental spending, I completely disagree with this argument and I will discuss my view in this essay.
To begin with, those who think public funds should be directed to railways might argue that it can attract passengers to use trains again. This is because such a sort of transportation is considered one the oldest means, which is not equipped with recent technologies, such as GPS tracking service and Wifi. For example, trains in a developing country like Egypt are the worst way of commuting. Therefore, it is commonly known that Egyptians prefer to use other means, such as vehicles and planes. In contrast, If the government spends its funding in trains, this will attract commuters to such a mean.
However, I would totally believe that it is pivotal to spend governments' money on roads. The reason for this is that there are many road accidents occur because of poor roads' infrastructure. For instance, this is can be seen by a growing number of accidents in Egypt due to the lack of safety precautions in these roads. If, in contrast, the government developed such roads, this would save many people's live.
In conclusion, despite the fact that developing railways can have many benefits, such as attracting passengers and rising income, it is my firm belief that government should direct its money to improve roads.
There is no doubt that it is
important
to consider how
governments
should spend its money. Although
some
people
think
that
train
lines should be
given
the priority in the governmental spending, I completely disagree with this argument and I will discuss my view in this essay.
To
begin
with, those who
think
public funds should
be directed
to railways might argue that it can attract passengers to
use
trains
again. This is
because
such a sort of transportation
is considered
one the oldest means, which is not equipped with recent technologies, such as GPS tracking service and
Wifi
.
For example
,
trains
in a
developing country
like Egypt are the worst way of commuting.
Therefore
, it is
commonly
known that Egyptians prefer to
use
other means, such as vehicles and
planes
.
In contrast
, If the
government
spends its funding in
trains
, this will attract commuters to such a mean.
However
, I would
totally
believe that it is pivotal to spend
governments
' money on
roads
.
The reason for this is
that there are
many
road
accidents occur
because
of poor roads' infrastructure.
For instance
, this is can be
seen
by a growing number of accidents in Egypt due to the lack of safety precautions in these
roads
. If,
in contrast
, the
government
developed such
roads
, this would save
many
people
's
live
.
In conclusion
, despite the fact that developing railways can have
many
benefits, such as attracting passengers and rising income, it is my firm belief that
government
should direct its money to
improve
roads
.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes