An infant’s future life is successful or not, it all depends on what the child studied and learnt in his or her school. This is why some people think it is more imperative for children to study academic subjects than physical, psychological subjects. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view
Firstly, STEM ( science, technology, engineering and mathematics) only will cultivate the child’s mind in a highly robotic way. Calculating and analysing may raise students’s intelligent but emotion (like EQ) which will not be considered as creative and dynamic for the youngsters. One study found that the ones who took non-academic subjects as options in school curriculum increased their IQ and EQ scores by 2. 5 points compared with who did not have those lessons. Hence, for those who do not take physical or music education will create a lower rate of being recruited.
Secondly, education liberty is a privilege of school-takers, though music or art subjects are not compulsory subjects but one thing is certain, most of pupils would make these fun objects no longer be optional subjects if they have authority to do so. Education should be geared to the students’s needs and abilities so that school will become their second home where they can express themselves more comfortably. As a result, youngsters are informed with constitutional, applicable and essential information and skills and are prepared with superior qualities to function as individual members of society which is necessary for their future career.
Overall, it is true that further and higher education requires academic qualification. However, for a better future career, school curriculum should include both sides of educating, academic and non-academic courses
An infant’s future life is successful or not, it all depends on what the child studied and
learnt
in
his or her
school
. This is why
some
people
think
it is more imperative for children to study academic
subjects
than physical, psychological
subjects
.
Personally
, I completely disagree with this point of view
Firstly
, STEM
(
science, technology, engineering and mathematics)
only
will cultivate the child’s mind in a
highly
robotic way. Calculating and
analysing
may raise
students’s
intelligent
but
emotion (like EQ) which will not
be considered
as creative and dynamic for the youngsters. One study found that the ones who took non-academic
subjects
as options in
school
curriculum increased their IQ and EQ scores by 2. 5 points compared with who did not have those lessons.
Hence
, for those who do not take physical or music
education
will create a lower rate of
being recruited
.
Secondly
,
education
liberty is a privilege of school-takers, though music or art
subjects
are not compulsory
subjects
but
one thing is certain,
most of pupils
would
make
these fun objects no longer be optional
subjects
if they have authority to do
so
.
Education
should
be geared
to the
students’s
needs and abilities
so
that
school
will become their second home where they can express themselves more
comfortably
.
As a result
, youngsters
are informed
with constitutional, applicable and essential information and
skills
and
are prepared
with superior qualities to function as individual members of society which is necessary for their future career.
Overall
, it is true that
further
and higher
education
requires academic qualification.
However
, for a better future career,
school
curriculum should include both sides of educating, academic and non-academic courses