Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast v.36

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. 36
There is an ongoing controversy about whether the government should make the waste recycling a legal requirement for the residents. Someone disagree with this idea, claiming that it should be people’s right to choose their own waste management. However, in my opinion, I think it’s better for the government to make it a law for several reasons. First, with the law, it is easier to manage the waste from domestic use. These days, the residential areas are scatter all over the city, making it’s harder to get the management done effectively. For instance, in the past century, people in Thailand tended to live near the rivers, but now people can live anywhere because there are sufficient facilities, such as water and electricity, available. So the authorities, who are responsible for waste management, have to work at many different areas, spending more time to deal with the problems. So, it would be easier for the government to impose the law about recycling the waste in order to reduce the authorities’ jobs that may cause by the complex urban area right now. Second, resident’s recycling can create financial benefits to the country. Instead of investing on new waste incineration plants to serve the increasing waste from the increasing population, enforcing people to recycle their own trashes help the country save the costs. There was an report in Thailand about the waste problems in some area that the volume of waste that need to be eliminate is now exceed the incineration’s capacity, leaving the wastes unclear and creating the pollution to the city. This problem won’t happen if the resident is responsible for their own wastes. Clearly, it’s better to make the recycling the law requirement. In conclusion, there’re many advantages of imposing the law about waste recycling. It makes the government easier to manage the waste and it has financial benefit to do so. Therefore, I am strongly convinced that law requirement for recycling the waste is needed.
There is an ongoing controversy about whether the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
a legal requirement for the residents. Someone
The pronoun 'Someone' is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: "disagrees", "disagreed".
disagree
with this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
, claiming that it should be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
right to choose their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
management.
However
, in my opinion, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
it’s better for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
it a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
law
for several reasons.

First
, with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
law
, it is easier to manage the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
from domestic
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
. These days, the residential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
areas
are scatter all over the city, making
Did you mean "its" (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (short form of 'it is')?
it’s
harder to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
the management done
effectively
.
For instance
, in the past century,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in Thailand tended to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
near the rivers,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
anywhere
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
there are sufficient facilities, such as water and electricity, available.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
the authorities, who are responsible for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
management,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
work at
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
areas
, spending more time to deal with the problems.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, it would be easier for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
to impose the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
law
about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
in order to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the authorities’ jobs that may cause by the complex urban
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
area
right
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
.

Second, resident’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
can create financial benefits to the country.
Instead
of investing on new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
incineration plants to serve the increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
from the increasing population, enforcing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to recycle their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
trashes
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the country save the costs. There was
Use "a" instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
an
report in Thailand about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
problems in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
area
that the volume of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
that need to be
Consider using a past participle here: "eliminated".
eliminate
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
exceed the incineration’s capacity, leaving the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wastes
unclear and creating the pollution to the city. This problem won’t happen if the resident is responsible for their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wastes
.
Clearly
, it’s better to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
law
requirement.

In conclusion
, there’re
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
advantages of imposing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
law
about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
. It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
makes
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
easier to manage the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
and it has financial benefit to do
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
.
Therefore
, I am
strongly
convinced that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
law
requirement for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recycling
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
is needed
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
42Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes
Change your language and you change your thoughts.
Karl Albrecht

IELTS essay Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. 36

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
326 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts