Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.11

Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. v. 11
It is true that medicines and other products are tested on animals bring numerous advantages for people. While many people believe that humanity should be undertaken those experiments, I would argue that animal testing is morally wrong. On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why a limited amount of animal research is necessary for the development of medicines. Firstly, experiments using animals also have been taken into action for so long time, which support for experts to invent diseases treatments. As a result, it helps people to improve the standard of living. Secondly, some studies are dangerous for the human, whereas, it is safe toward some particular creatures. For instance, supporters in the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. On the other hand, I suppose that they should not use animals for mankind purposes like medical tests. One reason is that animals play an important role in the balance of the ecosystem of the biodiversity process on earth. People should protect them because many wild animals are killed just for medical experiments. In addition, it is an unethical action that Government has enacted laws to save creatures, especially rare animals. To be specific, laboratory rabbit may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. In conclusion, although whether to use animals or not for benefit of humanity is still a controversial issue, it seems to me that it is better when stopping creature testing to ensure that the next generation could exploit the animal resource.
It is true that medicines and other products are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
bring numerous advantages for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. While
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that humanity should be undertaken those experiments, I would argue that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
testing is
morally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
.

On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why a limited amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
research is necessary for the development of medicines.
Firstly
, experiments using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
also
have
been taken
into action for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
long time, which support for experts to invent diseases treatments.
As a result
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
the standard of living.
Secondly
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
studies are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
for the human, whereas, it is safe toward
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
particular creatures.
For instance
, supporters in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can
be justified
if human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
are saved
.

On the other hand
, I suppose that they should not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for mankind purposes like medical
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
. One reason is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
play an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
role in the balance of the ecosystem of the biodiversity process on earth.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
should protect them
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are killed
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
for medical experiments.
In addition
, it is an unethical action that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Government
has enacted laws to save creatures,
especially
rare
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. To be specific, laboratory rabbit may be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
an illness
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that the effectiveness of a new drug can
be measured
.

In conclusion
, although whether to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
or not for benefit of humanity is
still
a controversial issue, it seems to me that it is better when stopping creature testing to ensure that the
next
generation could exploit the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
resource.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
15Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. v. 11

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
277 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts