It is increasingly common that celebrities and sport stars promote international charitable events. While Some thought that they do it to popularize those events, Others think this action, Consequently, led to public stigma, That it is no longer an urgent to support those events. In this essay, I will discuss both contradicting statements using current evidence that supports it.
On one hand, Celebrities control the supportive power of their fans. Celebrities are considered as a role model for societies, Because they are regarded as an example of successful person. Thus, Large percentage of fans will mimic the movement of a certain popular character. Everything they do in their daily life are constantly being copied by their followers. Furthermore, If they give inspirational lecture on the public eye, Consequently, their fan-base from all over the world will follow that trend and will promote that message even further to their relatives. Although, plenty of famous people promote violence and anti-Christian movement, and their fans tends to follow them obliviously, there are still some who survive and actually impact the world positively. Popular character must protect and give a good trend to their fan-base, Because their action will be imitated by their followers.
On the other hand, The presence of famous figures tends to make publicly refuse to care. The majority thinks that the support of a famous artist is ample for the endowing grouping, because most of artist donate a humongous amount of money into the co-operation. Otherwise, they only donate their verbal contribution towards the institution rather than donating their private wealth. It often led to the failure of a charity because publicly refuse to donate their's to the institution. A research that is conducted on a private charitable management that help starving peasants in Africa stated that their income decline significantly after a campaign was conducted by several celebrities. Therefore, Not all monetary funds of a charity could be solved by inviting and persuade star figure to promote your charity.
To conclude, Despite the good intention from famous figures, public often responds to a different perception than the prior intention. Therefore, before you launch a campaign about a philanthropic event, One must consider every single aspect of risk regarding the effect of the campaign itself.
It is
increasingly
common that
celebrities
and sport stars
promote
international charitable
events
. While
Some
thought
that they do it to popularize those
events
, Others
think
this action,
Consequently
, led to public stigma, That it is no longer an urgent to support those
events
. In this essay, I will discuss both contradicting statements using
current
evidence that supports it.
On one hand,
Celebrities
control the supportive power of their fans.
Celebrities
are considered
as a role model for societies,
Because
they
are regarded
as an example of successful person.
Thus
, Large percentage of fans will mimic the movement of a certain popular character. Everything they do in their daily life are
constantly
being copied
by their followers.
Furthermore
, If they give inspirational lecture on the public eye,
Consequently
, their fan-base from all over the world will follow that trend and will
promote
that message even
further
to their relatives. Although,
plenty
of
famous
people
promote
violence and anti-Christian movement, and their fans tends to follow them
obliviously
, there are
still
some
who survive and actually impact the world
positively
. Popular character
must
protect and give a
good
trend to their fan-base,
Because
their action will
be imitated
by their followers.
On the other hand
, The presence of
famous
figures tends to
make
publicly
refuse to care. The majority
thinks
that the support of a
famous
artist is ample for the endowing grouping,
because
most of artist
donate a humongous amount of money into the co-operation.
Otherwise
, they
only
donate their verbal contribution towards the institution
rather
than donating their private wealth. It
often
led to the failure of a charity
because
publicly
refuse to donate
their's
to the institution.
A research
that
is conducted
on a private charitable management that
help
starving
peasants in Africa stated that their income decline
significantly
after a campaign
was conducted
by several
celebrities
.
Therefore
, Not all monetary funds of a charity could
be solved
by inviting and persuade star figure to
promote
your charity.
To conclude
, Despite the
good
intention from
famous
figures, public
often
responds to a
different
perception than the prior intention.
Therefore
,
before
you launch a campaign about a philanthropic
event
, One
must
consider every single aspect of
risk
regarding the effect of the campaign itself.