In the contemporary world, it is common belief that participate in an unpaid community service program would be mandatory for greater outcomes in many aspects of humanity. Although, it is important to some parents would not agree to this because, they do not want their children to go out and clean the city at their younger age, personally, I strongly believe that parents should encourage their children to do free community work for a society. In the following essay, I will discuss this issue using some example to support my views and demonstrates points. However, the unpaid community service should compulsory to high school programmes have their own positive and negative sides and in following essay we will discuss them in detail.
First of all, convincing argument can be that helping society with unpaid community service is a good initiate to have a brighter future. To begin with, children should have taught to collect a donation for physically disabled people without any personal profit. In other words, if children learn to donate money for a good cause at school level, then it would be good help for the people who are handicapped; therefore, the same message they convey to their parents or friends and so that they will do the same. The second reason for my belief is that improving the neighbourhood. For instance, children should have taught to clean their society by keeping the garbage in the garbage bag, do not throw the garbage outside in a public place; as a result, there would be lesser disease and healthier life that would be beneficial for them. Additionally, teach sports to younger children is a good way to help each other who do not know how to play that any particular sport. For example, sometimes younger people feels hard to play some sports, but if they get a guidance from any other who is good at this, then that would be helpful for them. If these scenarios have merit, then conclusion drawn in the original argument is significantly strengthened.
On the other hand, some arguments can be made that teaching school children collect money for a donation would result harmful. The main reason for this is if one child collects more money than other then they might feel sad while other might make misuse of money they collected. However, closer examination would reveal that if the collection of money by children is monitored by their parent or teacher then there would be less or almost no chance of misuse of money. Apart from this, further analysis would make it clear that collecting money for a good cause is always a good step toward strong humanity.
To sum up, although there are some benefits of not having compulsion to unpaid community service at high school programme, the advantages of having a compulsion to do unpaid community work surely outweigh its disadvantage. Having considered all the arguments above, I would concede that teaching children at school level for helping others for free would always be a good habit.
In the contemporary world, it is common belief that participate in an unpaid
community
service
program would be mandatory for greater outcomes in
many
aspects of humanity. Although, it is
important
to
some
parents
would not
agree
to this
because
, they do not want their
children
to go out and clean the city at their younger age,
personally
, I
strongly
believe that
parents
should encourage their
children
to do free
community
work for a society. In the following essay, I will discuss this issue using
some
example to support my views and demonstrates points.
However
, the unpaid
community
service
should compulsory to high
school
programmes
have their
own
positive
and
negative
sides and in following essay we will discuss them in detail.
First of all
, convincing
argument
can be that helping society with unpaid
community
service
is a
good
initiate to have a brighter future. To
begin
with,
children
should have taught to collect a donation for
physically
disabled
people
without any personal profit. In
other
words, if
children
learn to donate
money
for a
good
cause at
school
level, then it would be
good
help
for the
people
who
are handicapped
;
therefore
, the same message they convey to their
parents
or friends and
so
that they will do the same. The second reason for my belief is that improving the
neighbourhood
.
For instance
,
children
should have taught to clean their society by keeping the garbage in the garbage bag, do not throw the garbage outside in a public place;
as a result
, there would be lesser disease and healthier life that would be beneficial for them.
Additionally
, teach sports to younger
children
is a
good
way to
help
each
other
who do not know how to play that any particular sport.
For example
,
sometimes
younger
people
feels
hard
to play
some
sports,
but
if they
get
a guidance from any
other
who is
good
at this, then that would be helpful for them. If these scenarios have merit, then conclusion drawn in the original
argument
is
significantly
strengthened.
On the
other
hand,
some
arguments
can
be made
that teaching
school
children
collect
money
for a donation would result harmful. The main reason for this is if one child collects more
money
than
other then
they might feel sad while
other
might
make
misuse of
money
they collected.
However
, closer examination would reveal that if the collection of
money
by
children
is monitored
by their
parent
or teacher then there would be less or almost no chance of misuse of
money
. Apart from this,
further
analysis would
make
it
clear
that collecting
money
for a
good
cause is always a
good
step toward strong humanity.
To sum up, although there are
some
benefits of not having compulsion to unpaid
community
service
at high
school
programme
, the advantages of having a compulsion to do unpaid
community
work
surely
outweigh its disadvantage. Having considered all the
arguments
above, I would concede that teaching
children
at
school
level for helping others for free would always be a
good
habit.