It cannot be doubted that societies must do all they can to support future generations and, in particular adolescents. While many may think that making teenagers do community work without payment as part of the secondary school curriculum would be beneficial, I strongly oppose this position for a couple of reasons.
The most significant reason why adolescents ought not to be forced into doing free services in the
community is that it would likely breed resentment. The reason for this is people are naturally averse to doing anything that seems forced upon them. In other words, if teenagers are pushed into doing work for free, they may perceive it as slavery and resent not only the work itself, but the school and community as well. As a result, they will not take to the experience and thus not learn or grow as much as they could. If, by contrast, they had a choice about doing charitable work, then those who were interested could apply for it and benefit a lot more.
Furthermore, inserting community work into teenagers’ schedules would cause them additional undue stress. This is because they are already obligated to study a lot of subjects and have other commitments as well, which are arguably more important. For instance, it is during one’s teenage
years when he not only is required to prepare for university entrance exams, but is also under pressure to decide on his own career. Having adolescents serve their community at this busy time of their lives, therefore, will only jeopardise their examination results and futures.
In conclusion, I do not support community service programmes being incorporated into high school
curriculums because it would lead to the potential risk of holding the students back in their studies,
and it would be highly likely that they would carry out the work begrudgingly in any case.
It cannot
be doubted
that societies
must
do all they can to support future generations and,
in particular
adolescents. While
many
may
think
that making
teenagers
do
community
work
without payment as part of the secondary school curriculum would be beneficial, I
strongly
oppose this position for a couple of reasons.
The most significant reason why adolescents ought not to
be forced
into
doing
free services in the
community is that it would likely breed resentment.
The reason for this is
people
are
naturally
averse to
doing
anything that seems forced upon them.
In other words
, if
teenagers
are pushed
into
doing
work
for free, they may perceive it as slavery and resent not
only
the
work
itself,
but
the school and
community
as well
.
As a result
, they will not take to the experience and
thus
not learn or grow as much as they could. If, by contrast, they had a choice about
doing
charitable
work
, then those who
were interested
could apply for it and benefit a lot more.
Furthermore
, inserting
community
work
into
teenagers
’ schedules would cause them additional undue
stress
. This is
because
they are already obligated to study
a lot of
subjects and have other commitments
as well
, which are
arguably
more
important
.
For instance
, it is during one’s teenage
years when he not
only
is required
to prepare for university entrance exams,
but
is
also
under pressure to decide on his
own
career. Having adolescents serve their
community
at this busy time of their
lives
,
therefore
, will
only
jeopardise their examination results and futures.
In conclusion
, I do not support
community
service programmes
being incorporated
into high school
curriculums
because
it would lead to the potential
risk
of holding the students back in their studies,
and it would be
highly
likely that they would carry out the
work
begrudgingly
in any case.